[ad_1]
Thursday announcement that a The College Football Playoff subcommittee recommends expanding to 12 teams from the current four shows will almost certainly add a new element to the now full-fledged debate on the treatment of athletes in large universities.
Expanding the CFP would lead to a huge increase in school revenue from the event, and while it may be years away, it is now being debated in the midst of ongoing federal legislation on athletes ’compensation and their health, safety and educational opportunities.
The U.S. Senate Trade Committee held a hearing on Wednesday designed to focus on how best to draft a federal law that would expand athletes ’ability to make money from their name, image, and appearance (NIL) through actions such as approval agreements, commercializing social media tracking, or earning signatures. signing. The NCAA has put pressure on Congress to resolve a number of recently passed state NIL laws, seven of which would allow athletes to operate NIL as of July 1.
But as the association also sought protection from litigation related to athletes ’compensation rules, several committee members focused their remarks and questions on athlete health coverage and NCAA safety standards, which are in the form of guidelines rather than enforceable rules.
In statements to USA TODAY Sports on Thursday night, two senators said they considered the CFP expansion proposal problematic in the current athlete environment.
NEW PROPOSAL:The group recommends expanding the College Football Playoff to 12 teams
OPINION:The expansion of the College Football Playoff to 12 teams is long overdue and complicated
MORE:How last season’s CFP would have looked with 12 teams
The only guaranteed result for an extended playoffs and a longer season is more league wins that players won’t see in the slightest just its money, said Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Who serves on the trade subcommittee, which could be the first stop on the university’s sports bill. I doubt it even came about that this increases the risk of injury to players.
Said Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Who had provided two college sports laws in this congressional session: This is another example of sports leaders and administrators at large universities making decisions just to increase their own revenue while still setting needs and wants. the health of college athletes in the back burner.
It’s crazy that the athletes who created the product get a word of zero in a decision as big as this, and they don’t get any of the millions in profits that come from additional games. That is why I introduced legislation to help these athletes organize and collectively negotiate for themselves.
Capitol Hill’s operations will continue next week as the Trade Committee announced late Thursday that it will have a new hearing on June 17th. The session will highlight the experiences of college athletes as Congress considers proposals to help athletes earn money for their name, image, and similarity to improve athlete health care; and improve grant protection and transfer rights, including in the committee bulletin.
Witnesses were not immediately identified, but during Wednesday’s interrogation, committee chairman Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., Said she planned to hold a second session where she planned to keep the athletes as panels.
[ad_2]
picture credit