[ad_1]
A member of the European Central Bank’s Supervisory Board has warned that the crypto rules in the draft EU Crypto-Asset Markets Act (MiCA) “will not be enough on their own.” While stressing that “the MiCA will put in place important safeguards to prevent incidents similar to the FTX case from occurring”, she warned: “Some areas still need to be strengthened”.
ECB McCaul Warns of Inadequate EU Crypto Regulation
European Central Bank Supervisory Board member Elizabeth McCaul discussed cryptocurrency regulation in a blog post published by the ECB on Wednesday.
She explained that the regulation proposed by the European Union for crypto assets is insufficient and needs to be strengthened to deal effectively with crypto risks. The European Parliament is expected to vote on the Crypto-Asset Markets Bill (MiCA) later this month. McCaul said:
Although the new Basel standard and the MiCA are important steps, I am afraid they are not enough on their own.
The ECB board member pointed out that major crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) “should be subject to both stricter requirements and enhanced oversight”, pointing out that “none of the two is only supported by the MiCA”.
While noting that the MiCA will establish important safeguards to prevent incidents similar to the FTX case from occurring, such as strong governance principles like segregation of client funds and requirements for external audits, it warned :
Some areas still need to be strengthened.
McCaul raised concerns about how the size of crypto-asset service providers is measured. She pointed out that collapsed crypto exchange FTX “would not have been classified as a significant CASP under MiCA because it did not meet the 15 million active user threshold. She continued:
In fact, Binance, which is the biggest crypto player, is said to have between 28 and 29 million active users globally, but probably wouldn’t even meet the threshold to be classified as important in the EU.
The ECB Executive Board member also highlighted the need to develop new quantitative metrics for different types of businesses, such as trading volume for trading venues or assets under custody for custodian businesses.
Noting that MiCA only applies at the individual entity level, she suggested that the thresholds be assessed at the group level rather than the individual entity level due to the complexity of operations. Furthermore, she stated that conflicts of interest must be identified not only within the group but also between affiliated entities.
Tags in this story ECB, ECB Crypto Regulation, ECB Crypto Rules, ECB Cryptocurrency Regulation, Elizabeth McCaul, Elizabeth McCaul bitcoin, Elizabeth McCaul crypto, Elizabeth McCaul cryptocurrency, European Central Bank, European Central Bank crypto, European Central Bank cryptocurrency, MiCA, MiCA crypto, MiCA cryptocurrency
What do you think of ECB board member saying EU crypto rules are inadequate? Let us know in the comments section below.
Kevin Helms
Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
More popular newsIn case you missed it
|
Sources 2/ https://news.bitcoin.com/ecb-board-member-warns-eus-new-crypto-rules-not-sufficient/ The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
[ad_2]