Malta’s “Wild West” Approach: Regulators Claim $ 70 Billion in Cryptos Passed Through “Blockchain Island” Regulation Bitcoin Planet

[ad_1]

The island country of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea has been known to be supportive of cryptocurrency solutions and blockchain technology for years now. According to a regional report, government sources say more than $ 70 billion has flowed through the country in recent years as regulations were lax. In addition, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) criticized Malta in a recent confidential meeting.

Members of a confidential meeting of the FATF critical of Malta

Sources aware of [a] FATF confidential meeting, said the financial regulator was concerned about Malta, according to a regional report released by timesofmalta.com. The FATF held a confidential meeting and it was said that some 60 billion cryptocurrency (over $ 70 billion) had crossed the borders of the island of Malta, according to the report.

The sources of the articles are unknown, but FATF meeting participants pointed out that one of the biggest problems with Malta was that it would have facilitated a large volume of cryptocurrency and did so without sufficient oversight.

Organizations and businesses that have offices in Malta include crypto companies like Okex, Coinvest, Decentralized Ventures, Yovo, Ledger Projects, Stasis, Bitmalta, and the Blockchain Malta Association. Crypto solutions and blockchain technology are so popular in Malta that the country is dubbed the Blockchain Island.

At the end of April, however, as regulations swept across the Maltese nation, 70% of crypto companies in the industry had yet to apply for a license. During that time, 26 crypto companies applied, but none of them were approved. Crypto regulations in Malta started to emerge in the country in the summer of 2018.

The timesofmalta.com report said anonymous sources in the crypto industry have insisted that Malta is now heavily regulated. In addition, they have denied estimates of the FATF crypto transactions that allegedly originate from the island country. A report by Michael Morell, former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), explained that crypto exchanges have accessible data at their fingertips.

Sources do not disclose the exact timeframe or how the FATF obtained the transaction data

Additionally, in 2019, the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) appointed blockchain watchdog company Ciphertrace to help regulators tackle non-compliance. Ciphertraces’ job is to monitor transactions that pass through local crypto exchanges and digital wallets.

The timesofmalta.com study does not reveal how the FATF obtained its transaction estimates which apparently show billions of dollars in crypto passing through Malta. Those familiar with the issue of the FATF meeting also did not give details on the exact date of transit of funds through Malta, in regards to the exact timelines.

Speaking of the threat of money laundering, it has long been established that cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, which use a publicly accessible transaction ledger, are a very effective crime-fighting and intelligence-gathering tool. , added the Morells report.

What do you think of the alleged $ 70 billion worth of crypto flowing through Malta when regulations were less important? Let us know what you think of this topic in the comments section below.

Tags in this story $ 70 billion, $ 60 billion, Bitcoin, BTC, CIA, Ciphertrace, Crypto, fatf, FATF crypto transaction estimates, island country, Malta, Malta Blockchain, Malta Crypto Transactions, MFSA, Michael Morell, timesofmalta. com transactions

Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or business. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, good or service mentioned in this article.

[ad_2]

picture credit

Related Posts