Do Americans deserve the right to return a president?

[ad_1]

During the GOP-controlled Senate of former President TrumpDonald TrumpPennsylvania to spend up to 0K on the election investigation Trump congratulated Rittenhouse on the acquittal. he was out of the office. Change.org tried to give them a platform to vent their anger and rage. Through various petitions, the group has collected more than 6 million signatures from people who want to “bail” Trump, impeach him, or remind him of his election.

“We, the signatories, have no confidence in Donald Trump’s ability to lead our country,” a petition read. “He is unfit for office, he is a national disgrace… he is hopelessly compromised, blatantly unethical, and obviously ignorant. The best and most beneficial way to replace him with a suitable POTUS is a national recall election, and sooner is better before he and his administration do more damage.

There you are: Grassroots democracy in action.

It can be safely assumed that the signatories to this petition would be hesitant to apply at least one of those charges to President BidenJoe BidenPennsylvania’s GOP-controlled Senate that spent up to 0K on the election investigation. by Emergent Biosolutions-Boosters for everyone MORE or his family, but it’s also safe to assume that millions of other Americans will be happy to do just that.

All of this begs the question: In our era of polarized politics, where no one wants to give even an inch on any subject, is there an option for one side or the other to actually bring back a US president? The answer is no. “

And this leads to another question: Do Americans deserve the right to bring back a president?

Again, in an era of hate-filled politics, that seems like an option that millions of Americans on both sides of the divide will wholeheartedly support that “We’re always right-you’re always wrong.”

Most everyone today is sadly viewed through a partisan, self-serving lens. But what if voters elected a U.S. president that even so many people from the opposing side would agree is truly incompetent, corrupt, personally flawed or obviously has no interest in the welfare of the American people?

And what if that embarrassment at the negative qualities and responsibilities of a president still hasn’t helped the 25th Amendment get implemented? Section IV of that amendment – cited by ad nauseam by liberals as a vehicle to remove Trump from the White House – reads:

“When the Vice President and a majority of any of the chief officers of the executive department or of such other body as may be provided by Congress by law, forward to the President pro tempore of the Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to perform the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately exercise the powers and duties of office as Acting President. ”

Clearly, that section could put too much power and temptation in the hands of a small group of people to attempt to override the American citizens ’preference for partisan means.

But what if Americans decide that the president – perhaps even one for whom they voted – is no longer serving the country and clearly none of their best interests at heart? Does “We, the People” have to suffer for several years from the damage that such a president could inflict-someone who can take away our national and economic security while he is making a fuss about the Oval Office? The answer is “Yes, we do.”

So, what is a possible solution to this problem? A new constitutional amendment to allow the recall of a president.

At the federal level, there is no mechanism to reinstate elected officials, even members of Congress. But, as we have witnessed in the failed attempt to concern California Gov. schools. Gavin NewsomGavin NewsomLA offering gift cards, ‘Hamilton’ tickets for student vaccinations Equilibrium/Sustainability-Presented by Southern Company-Indigenous solar startups see business as activism Billions at stake in battle the future of gambling in California MORE, that option exists in some states and cities.

The need for the American people to have the option to regain a president has been floated several times. In 1951, Robert Hendrickson, a Republican senator from New Jersey, possibly tired of nearly two decades of Democratic leadership from the White House, offered such an amendment to the constitution. The suggestion is nowhere to be found, but it is an idea that could have a steam on American partisans.

How exactly does that bring the ability to recall a president?

The first step could offer an option to voters during the national election. Would most of them agree that such an escape clause should be available to them? If they vote yes, an amendment should be given serious consideration to reclaim a president.

Common sense will dictate that if we remember a mayor or a governor who can do irreparable damage to a city or a state, we must save the country from the same fate. Unfortunately, as long as that “do-over” is not given, we are stuck with the mistake made by most Americans at the voting booth.

Douglas MacKinnon, a political and communications consultant, was a White House writer for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush, and former special assistant for policy and communications at the Pentagon during the last three years of the Bush administration.

[ad_2]