The Assassination of Reproductive Freedom by Serial Sexual Assaulter Donald Trump and the Coward Susan Collins

[ad_1]

He said he would do it, we held a national referendum on email server management best practices, and then he did it:

Thus ends Roe v. Wade – without pretense or reason, the tireless dream of the conservative forced birth movement, was fulfilled by the bare promises of Donald Trump, who said if he could put “another two or maybe three magistrates,” Roe will be reversed “automatically, in my opinion, because I put pro-life justices in Court.” On Wednesday, all three Trump justices who heard a case challenging Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban seemed ready to prove he was right. Even John Roberts ’feeble attempt at describing, if not actually finding, a compromise would mean the reversal of all previous Supreme Court decisions that legalized abortion.

[…]

Kavanaugh talked about how shared abortion is and how neutral the Constitution is to it, and how, frankly, it’s a big country – “There will be different answers in Mississippi and New York, different in California or Alabama, ”He said-with the implication that the domination of the body and the future is just blue-state elitism.

Barrett did exactly what he was appointed to do, saying that forced pregnancy and childbirth are not a big deal because, as he repeatedly repeats, “safe haven” laws allow parents to renounce their rights and surrender babies for adoption by others. The concerns expressed by the pro-choice side about the impact of the abortion ban on women’s equality, she said, “focused on the consequences of parenthood and the obligations of motherhood that flow from pregnancy. Why don’t safe-haven laws address that problem? ” (She added, frightening for vaccine mandates going through the courts, “There is no question of violating bodily autonomy, which we have in other contexts like vaccines.”) She didn’t have to say she had given birth to a baby. five times and adopted two children and still reached the Supreme Court; his very presence provided cover to anyone who sought it.

The idea that overruling Roe would “return the issue to the states” is cynical nonsense on many levels, but more about that later!

It’s worth noting here that while Ginsburg has garnered a lot of (reasonable) criticism for his reckless gambling, overruling Roe is also a major legacy of Anthony Kennedy, who retired strategically to give up a seat on the Supreme Court. to Donald Trump who knows with absolute certainty. that he would nominate someone to vote to overrule Roe. And as Sotomayor pointed out that decision also threatens Kennedy’s GLBTQ+ decisions.

[ad_2]