Mark Meadows Says Trump Is Sad After Texas Supreme Court Decision

[ad_1]

Mark Meadows said Donald Trump was “saddened” when the Supreme Court threw out Texas’s election suit. The case is a rude and dubious bid by Texas to throw the 2020 election at Trump. “Do you believe in this?” Meadows’ memoir recalls what Trump said after the court dropped the lawsuit. LoadingSomeone is loading.

We’re sorry! We encountered a system failure and we were unable to retrieve your email at this time.

Thank you for signing up!

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows wrote in his new memoir, “The Chief’s Chief,” that he has never seen Donald Trump look “desponde” like when the Supreme Court rejected Texas ’long-shot bid to overturn. the results of the 2020 elections in the US.

The Texas lawsuit argued that Joe Biden’s victories in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia should be discarded because of unsubstantiated allegations of widespread voter fraud. The suit said Republican-led legislatures in all four states should be allowed to pick a pro-Trump slate of voters to give Trump a victory. The case was supported by 18 Republican attorney generals, as well as a majority of House Republicans.

In a brief injunction released on Dec. 11, 2020, the high court said it would not hear the lawsuit, brought by Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, due to lack of status. “Texas has not shown a judiciary that has recognized interest in the way in which another state conducts its elections,” the court said in a one -page decision.

But Meadows erred in opinion in his diary, saying the court ruled that Trump himself – as opposed to Texas – “had no conviction to bring a challenge to an election in which he is running.”

“If he doesn’t have a standing, I wonder, who?” Meadows wrote. He added that “until now, I don’t think I’ve seen President Trump as desperate as he was when I entered the Oval Office in late December.”

“My head was down, I informed him that the Supreme Court was not hearing challenges to the election results,” the book said.

Meadows wrote that Trump said nothing for a while. Seconds later, he wrote, Trump looked up at the ceiling, folded his arms, and said, “Will you believe?”

“No sir,” Meadows recalled in reply. “No, I can’t.”

But he added that reflecting on the moment now, “considering what has happened in the last four years, this is sadly credible.”

Trump hyped a lot in the Texas case at the start of the Supreme Court decision.

“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!” he tweeted shortly before the court gave its opinion.

Texas’s request was immediately disputed by constitutional scholars as an unfulfilled and legally dubious request for judges to overturn a democratic result in a free and fair election.

As the Insider reported, despite efforts by Trump and Republicans to doubt the integrity of the 2020 election, there is no evidence of widespread election error or voter fraud.

Meadows in his book laments that the Trump camp’s allegations of voter fraud have been dismissed by courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority and three justices appointed by Trump.

“In most cases, cases are dismissed because judges believe that states have no‘ standpoint ’to bring cases,” Meadows said, referring to the legal principle that a party bringing a lawsuit or self -defense against one must show that it was caused by lawful harm or actions being challenged.

He went on to say, falsely, that “the facts of the fraud were not looked at by judges and courts.”

As The Washington Post noted, the lawsuits brought by Trump’s campaign and his GOP allies are based on fewer complaints and isolated instances compared to the widespread fraud the president alleges in most of his public comment. In almost all cases, judges determined that “Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their statements-just speculation, rumors or hearsay,” The Post said.

Several lawyers who led those cases have already been disciplined by the courts. In August, a federal judge imposed sanctions on Trump-aligned lawyers including Sidney Powell and Lin Wood for spouting nonsensical conspiracy theories in lawsuits the judge said were filed “in bad faith. and for the wrong purpose. “

And Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who was perhaps the most recognizable face of Trump’s election crusade, has been suspended from practicing law in New York and Washington, DC, after a division of appeals by the New York Supreme Court. York found “non -controversial evidence” that Giuliani had “made clear and deceptive statements to the courts, legislators and in general” about the election results.

[ad_2]