Womp, Womp: Melania Trump’s NFT Hat Auction Doesn’t Go to Plan

[ad_1]

When a young Slovene model named Melania Knauss boarded a plane to the United States in 1996, it is perhaps safe to say she had no idea of ​​the turns and twists of life reserved for her. Did she think she would wear a $ 100,000 wedding dress to marry one of the worst people in the world? That he would live in a gilded penthouse in the sky where the delicious taste died? That she will help her husband sell racist birtherism claims about the country’s first Black president? That she would wear a jacket with the words “I really don’t really care” to visit children separated from her parents, as a result of her husband’s policies? That almost a week later he would issue a statement about a violent insurrection instigated by his wife, and the thesis of the statement was he was the real victim of January 6? That he leaves the White House and enters… the blockchain business? No, we guess he didn’t, but here we are.

And, unfortunately for Melania Trump, things are not going as smoothly as she expected.

According to The Guardian:

What is the similarity of Melania Trump’s white hat, a painting of her wearing a hat and an NFT of an animated version of the hat? They were all put up for auction by the former first lady — and early Wednesday, failed to get the target price of the $ 250,000 opening bid. Trump announced earlier this month that he would auction off the autographed hat, which he wore to meet French president Emmanuel Macron, and his wife on an official visit to the state in 2018. The auction also included a watercolor painting of himself wearing a hat and a non-fungible token, or NFT, of the painting. He insisted that all bids be made on Solana tokens, a cryptocurrency.

When the auction ended on Wednesday, there were only five bids on the items, each with approximately the minimum required 1,800 Solana tokens. Although the minimum number of tokens was met, a steep dive into the crypto market over the past two weeks resulted in a final bid of approximately $ 170,000 — approximately $ 80,000 less than the opening bid threshold.

When Trump first announced the auction, he said a “portion” of the proceeds would go to charity, so it’s a legitimate shame that everything didn’t raise more money – which became even more embarrassing in the fact that the former The first lady’s team firmly refused to say how big that portion was, with her office choosing not to respond to direct questions about it. (According to CNN, it has “sought clarification several times from Trump’s spokesperson about the‘ portion of the proceeds ’” that will go to charity, requests that seem to have gone unanswered.) As a reminder, the long -term view of Donald Trump on charity is related to the history of the brave. claims that “that doesn’t always increase” and “continued illegal behavior.” So, there is.

If you would like to receive a Levin Report in your inbox every day, click here to subscribe.

Speaking of people shitting themselves over the mouse

Twitter content

This content can also be viewed on the site from which it originated.

Soooo … not a guy who spends his entire confirmation hearing screaming about his love of beer and denying allegations of sexual assault?

Twitter content

This content can also be viewed on the site from which it originated.

You’ll never believe, but conservatives have a problem with Biden’s promise to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court

Oddly, they have no problem with their current master and savior, Donald Trump, promising to propose a woman, or their original master and savior, Ronald Reagan, doing the same. Which means they’re partisan hacks that just oppose anything any Democrat does, or they don’t like the “Black” part of the “Black woman” equation. Either or both of these may be true! According to The New York Times:

[ad_2]