Judge awarded Trump, Habba almost $1 million for completely frivolous Clinton suit

[ad_1]

The judge ordered Trump and Habba to pay $938,000 to cover legal costs for the 31 defendants Trump linked in his year-old lawsuit. This is the second time Middlebrooks has sanctioned Habba in the Clinton case. The first instance was a $50,000 injunction sought by one defendant, Charles Dolan. The new round of sanctions was sought by the remaining defendants.

In the new order, Hillary Clinton got the largest award of fees for a single defendant: nearly $172,000.

It’s the latest legal setback for Trump, who continues to face the risk of advancing criminal investigations and civil lawsuits related to his effort to revoke the 2020 election and his retention of sensitive records of national security at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving office.

Middlebrooks’ ruling included a point-by-point recitation of the flaws in Trump’s initial lawsuit, noting that it often misquoted, distorted or cherrypicked from key documents he claimed supported the allegations. a massive conspiracy between Clinton and the Justice Department to target Trump for criminal prosecution .

The Amended Complaint is a hodgepodge of disconnected, often immaterial events, followed by an implausible conclusion. This is a deliberate attempt to disrupt; to tell stories without regard to facts, wrote Middlebrooks, an appointee of former president Bill Clinton.

He specifically cited Trumps claim that Clinton colluded with former FBI Director James Comey to seek impeachment of Trump that Middlebrooks said never happened as absolutely untrue. He also noted that Trump and Habba have repeatedly misrepresented the findings of special counsel Robert Muellers report. They also cited Russian intelligence that then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe shared with Sen. Lindsey Graham as the basis for one of their claims, without mentioning that it was Russian intelligence and Ratcliffe said it was unverified.

The lawyers of Mr. Trumps reliance on Russian intelligence as a good faith basis for their allegations, Middlebrooks wrote.

In his order, Middlebrooks addressed Habbas’ attacks on him in an interview with Fox News, which he said consistently distorted the facts of the case and made baseless allegations of improprieties by federal judges and magistrate He also recounted a litany of other lawsuits filed by Trump and his lawyers with similar signs of disrespect.

[ad_2]