Mo Brooks: The 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, the crooked kick ass speech was disfigured

[ad_1]

The U.S. Rep. Said. Mo Brooks, in a sworn affidavit, that he still believes the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump.

In a federal court filing, Brooks also said the back of his kick ass speech on Jan. 6 that preceded the unrest at the U.S. Capitol and explained that he was doing his job fighting election fraud and voter theft on behalf of of his constituent congresses in northern Alabama.

That was among three takeaways from Brooks’ affidavit he filed June 24 in federal court refuting the lawsuit filed against him by Democratic California Congressman Eric Swalwell. The defense also said Brooks would not have given a speech at the rally if a White House official had not asked him the previous day.

Brooks, a Republican from Huntsville, was named as a co -defendant in the lawsuit filed March 5 with Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr. and his attorney, Rudy Giuliani.

The affidavit is part of a 66-page filing from Brooks that, as dated June 24, was not filed by the court until July 2. It includes the full text of his speech on Jan. 6 as well as the results of the presidential election. in the five northern Alabama provinces that make up his congressional district that overwhelmingly supported Trump in November.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, in a series of orders this week, set a July 27 deadline for Swalwell to respond to Brooks ’petition for the case to be removed from him because he was acting in his role as a member of the House of Representatives. Also, the general counsel for the House of Representatives has the same deadline to respond to Brooks ’statement that he is acting within the scope of his office. Brooks has an Aug. 10 deadline to respond to those responses.

Deserves a breakdown of some of the most relevant and interesting aspects of the affidavit:

Brooks even said the election was stolen

Time has not softened Brooks ’stance: Trump deserves to be in the White House serving his second term in office. Despite that stance, there continues to be no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could affect the outcome of the election.

In the affidavit, Brooks incorrectly listed the election date as December 3, 2020. The election took place on November 3, 2020.

In my judgment, the evidence is overwhelming and compelling that the Dec. 3, 2020 election was the most voter fraud and election theft defeated of any election in U.S. history, Brooks said in the affidavit. Brooks did not disclose any of the evidence he cited in his statement.

He later wrote, In my judgment and opinion, if the votes legally can be counted by eligible American citizens, then President Donald Trump will be declared the winner in the 2020 presidential election contest.

There is no reason to suspect that Brooks has changed his mind. Weeks before the Capitol breach on Jan. 6 and subsequent congressional certification in the presidential election, Brooks was the first congressman to announce he would oppose that certification. His steadfast support for Trump also earned the former president’s Brooks Senate campaign endorsement.

What did and didn’t really mean kick ass

In the affidavit, Brooks said he has given hundreds of speeches in his political career. This line Today is the day that started taking the names of patriotic Americans and kicking ass is easily memorable in any of those speeches.

Even in a vacuum, that line is an attention holder. Against the backdrop as a tone-setting speech at the start of the pro-Trump rally on Jan. 6 with Brooks shouting words for emphasis and then followed by hours later of violence at the Capitol, kicking ass takes of its own life.

In the Swalwells lawsuit, the phrase kicking ass was mentioned on eight occasions.

Brooks intended these words as a threat of violence or intimidation to prevent certification voting from even taking place and / or force members of Congress to ignore election results, according to Swalwells ’lawsuit.

The lawsuit also said Brooks used those words, among others, while recognizing the instinct of some of Trump’s supporters to commit political violence. And those words are evidence that the defendants have violated the Anti-Terrorism Act.

In the affidavit, Brooks denied Swalwells’ allegations, saying he lied and twisted regarding the kicking ass line and, at another point, said Swalwell erred by splitting a sentence and omitting the previous sentence in a paragraph with two sentences emphasizing that I’m talking kicking ass in 2022 and 2024 ELECTIONS !, Brooks added emphasis to his filing.

The entire paragraph, as prepared by Brooks in the filing, includes the phrase kick:

But clearly, whatever the outcome of todays, elections in 2022 and 2024 are near, and America does not need and cannot stand, cannot tolerate any weaker, sober, soft Republican congressmen and senators who crave power and prestige the swamp has to offer, while groveling at the feet and knees of special interest group masters. As such, today is important in a different way, today is the day that American patriots are starting to take down names and kicking.

Brooks presented a nuanced explanation that he first gave less than a week after he gave the speech. However, two days after the rally, Brooks said he first used the word donkey as a code word for Democrats given that the party mascot was an donkey.

Brooks described a delicate process he used to prepare the speech.

In the affidavit, Brooks said, My intent to utter these words is to encourage Ellipse Rally attendees to leave the 2020 election (and, especially, in the earlier days two GOP Senator losses in Georgia) and to start focusing on the 2022 and 2024 elections.

This is like the key phrase in the second sentence because it emphasizes that the second sentence paragraphs are in the context of the first sentence paragraphs 2022 and 2024 election elections (which began on November 4, 2020), Brooks continued.

Corresponding to this is the middle part of the second sentence paragraph, which states, taking names. Whose names will be deducted? The names of senators and congressmen who did not vote for honest and accurate elections after the debate in the House and Senate in the afternoon. Once we get and take down their names, our task is to kick their ass in the 2022 and 2024 election cycles.

In the affidavit, Brooks said he was asked to speak the day before the rally by a White House official even though it was not Trump himself. He arranged the speech in his congressional office and timed, reviewed and modified and rehearsed my speech in my office in the Rayburn House Office Building, the affidavit said.

Brooks does everything for you

Or at least his constituents in Madison, Limestone, Lauderdale, Morgan and Jackson counties in northern Alabama.

His insistence that the election was stolen from Trump, the earnest speech he gave on Jan. 6 at the pro-Trump rally, his opposition to the results of the presidential election in the states of Arizona and Pennsylvania, Brooks did it for the people he represents, he said in the affidavit.

In the affidavit, Brooks listed election results in five counties – which showed a combined 64 percent of the vote for Trump. The former president received a majority of votes in all five counties.

It is my judgment, based on various interactions and communications with them, that the majority or a plurality of the citizens of the Alabama 5th Congressional District strongly support my conduct with regard to certain matters in particular. and accurately accused the Swalwells (lawsuit) about my efforts to count only according to the law thrown by eligible American citizens in the Nov. 3, 2020 election, Brooks affidavit said.

[ad_2]