Why is gambling reform happening and how are the plans tackling addiction? | Game

The government’s white paper outlining the proposed gambling regulatory reform is 268 pagesdealing with nearly every aspect of the UK’s £10 billion a year betting and gaming industry.

Most of the measures are far from final, with the finer technicalities subject to a year-long consultation process due to begin this summer. But the proposals offer a fascinating insight into what the game could look like in the future and why the review was necessary.

Why does this happen?

Laws governing gambling in Britain – Northern Ireland has a different regime – were passed in 2005 and implemented in 2007. Between these two dates the first iPhone hit the market, an invention that transformed the way people play.

Since then, online casino and sports betting revenues have skyrocketed as regulation fails to keep pace. The result, campaigners and MPs say, has been that vulnerable people, drug addicts and children have been exposed to high-octane gambling products. The review follows a series of high-profile cases involving financial ruin, depression and even suicideas well as multi-million pound fines for companies that misbehave.

Reforms avoid huge losses?

The government wants to impose “accessibility controls”, with two degrees of severity. Under the proposals, if a punter were to lose £125 in a month or £500 in a year, gambling companies would have to carry out low-level checks, such as research to see if a customer went bankrupt. If a punter loses £1,000 in one day or £2,000 over 90 days, stricter controls will be triggered. These thresholds could be halved for 18-24 year olds.

The government estimates that only 3% of gaming accounts would be subject to these enhanced checks, which could in theory be carried out without the customer’s knowledge, based on data from rating agencies. But customers may be asked to provide information such as payslips if the check raises concerns. The gambling lobby has fought hard against such “intrusive” controls.

Another measure aimed at stemming losses is a cap on bets on online slot machines. This will be set at between £2 and £15 but, like financial ability checks, the limits will be lower for those aged 18 to 24, potentially capped at £2. THE Game The Commission will carry out a consultation on accessibility controls while the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) will decide on slot machine limits.

What about helping drug addicts and preventing harm?

Betting operators will be subject to a compulsory levy, replacing the current voluntary system, to fund research, education and treatment for gambling addiction. This was thought to be set at 1% of revenue, which would yield more £100 million a year. However, DCMS will consult on the correct level for the levy.

The Department of Health and Social Care will take responsibility, alongside DCMS, for public messaging about gambling harms, which is now left to the industry and the charity GambleAware. This could translate into much harsher warnings, as opposed to much-criticized slogans concocted by the industry, such as “When the fun stops, stop” and “Take time to think.”

It could become mandatory for customers to set deposit limits on their online accounts or to force them to withdraw from these limits.

Are they going to do anything about advertising?

Yes and no, but mostly no. There will be no new restrictions on the volume or content of gambling advertisements, with the industry instead being encouraged to tighten controls designed to deflect advertisements from vulnerable people and children.

However, direct marketing, such as emails and text messages offering “free” spins and bonuses, could be strictly limited. The white paper criticized misleading descriptions such as “free bets” and hinted at a crackdown on “re-bet” requirements, where punters who receive a “bonus” free bet are required to make up to 50 additional bets within a tight deadline. before you can cash out.

It is likely that there are restrictions on this marketing, which could become “opt-in” only. The DCMS said that 35% of people with a gambling problem receive daily incentives to gamble, compared to just 4% of other people.

Other measures?

The Gambling Commission will get more resources to crack down on bad behavior by legitimate businesses and prosecute parallel market operators. There will also be a new gambling ombudsman, to help resolve disputes where bettors say they have lost money due to a company’s breaches of social responsibility.

Land-based casinos will be allowed to have more machines, be able to offer sports betting and give credit to “high-roller” customers.

Another under-reported measure is the work, already underway, to compel operators to share data so that a gambling addict banned by one company cannot simply go bet with another. It is also likely that there will be new restrictions on the design of gambling games to slow them down and remove characteristics known to promote addictive behaviors.

When will this happen and will it hurt gaming businesses?

There is a year-long consultation on most proposals, infuriating some campaigners, but the government says most measures will be implemented by summer 2024.

The white paper estimates this could cost betting companies £800million a year. However, shares of major players in the sector rose on Thursday as investors breathed a sigh of relief that the measures were not tougher.

To order a copy of Jackpot by Rob Davies (Guardian Faber, £14.99) for £8.79, go to guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.