[ad_1]
Postuma, R. B. et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 30, 1591–1601 (2015).
Poewe, W. et al. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 3, 1–21 (2017).
Antonini, A., Emmi, A. & Campagnolo, M. Beyond the Dopaminergic System: Lessons Learned from levodopa Resistant Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pr. 10, S50–S55 (2023).
Espay, A. J. et al. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson disease: Current and evolving concepts. Ann. Neurol. 84, 797–811 (2018).
Olanow, C. W., Calabresi, P. & Obeso, J. A. Continuous Dopaminergic Stimulation as a Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease: Current Status and Future Opportunities. Mov. Disord. 35, 1731–1744 (2020).
Deuschl, G. et al. European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society-European Section Guideline on the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease: I. Invasive Therapies. Mov. Disord. 37, 1360–1374 (2022).
Krack, P. et al. Five-Year Follow-up of Bilateral Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1925–1934 (2003).
Collomb-Clerc, A. & Welter, M. L. Effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic neurophysiological review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45, 371–388 (2015).
Pötter-Nerger, M. & Volkmann, J. Deep brain stimulation for gait and postural symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 28, 1609–1615 (2013).
Fenoy, A. J. & Simpson, R. K. Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. J. Neurosurg. 120, 132–139 (2014).
Madrid, J. & Benninger, D. H. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: Clinical evidence, latest concepts and future goals: A systematic review. J. Neurosci. Methods 347, 108957 (2021).
Caligiore, D. et al. Parkinson’s disease as a system-level disorder. npj Parkinsons Dis. 2, 1–9 (2016).
Ganguly, J., Murgai, A., Sharma, S., Aur, D. & Jog, M. Non-invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Movement Disorders. Front Neurosci. 14, 522 (2020).
Godeiro, C. et al. Use of non-invasive stimulation in movement disorders: a critical review. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 79, 630–646 (2021).
Bergmann, T. O., Karabanov, A., Hartwigsen, G., Thielscher, A. & Siebner, H. R. Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives. NeuroImage 140, 4–19 (2016).
Alekseichuk, I., Diers, K., Paulus, W. & Antal, A. Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES–fMRI approach. NeuroImage 140, 110–117 (2016).
Doyle Gaynor, L. M. F. et al. Suppression of beta oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus following cortical stimulation in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 1686–1695 (2008).
Herz, D. M. et al. Motivational Tuning of Fronto-Subthalamic Connectivity Facilitates Control of Action Impulses. J. Neurosci. 34, 3210–3217 (2014).
Peters, J. C. et al. Concurrent human TMS-EEG-fMRI enables monitoring of oscillatory brain state-dependent gating of cortico-subcortical network activity. Commun. Biol. 3, 40 (2020).
Ruff, C. C., Driver, J. & Bestmann, S. Combining TMS and fMRI: From ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition. Cortex 45, 1043–1049 (2009).
Siebner, H. R. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper. Clin. Neurophysiol. 140, 59–97 (2022).
Groppa, S. et al. The human dorsal premotor cortex facilitates the excitability of ipsilateral primary motor cortex via a short latency cortico-cortical route. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 419–430 (2012).
Groppa, S. et al. Subcortical substrates of TMS induced modulation of the cortico-cortical connectivity. Brain Stimul. 6, 138–146 (2013).
Strafella, A. P., Paus, T., Barrett, J. & Dagher, A. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Prefrontal Cortex Induces Dopamine Release in the Caudate Nucleus. J. Neurosci. 21, RC157–RC157 (2001).
Chervyakov, A. V., Chernyavsky, A. Y., Sinitsyn, D. O. & Piradov, M. A. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 303 (2015).
Huang, Y.-Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P. & Rothwell, J. C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45, 201–206 (2005).
Suppa, A. et al. Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects. Brain Stimul. 9, 323–335 (2016).
Antal, A. et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement. Clin. Neurophysiol. Pr. 7, 146–165 (2022).
Assenza, G. et al. Oscillatory Activities in Neurological Disorders of Elderly: Biomarkers to Target for Neuromodulation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 189 (2017).
Woods, A. J. et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin. Neurophysiol. 127, 1031–1048 (2016).
Wischnewski, M., Alekseichuk, I. & Opitz, A. Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 189–205 (2023).
Moliadze, V., Atalay, D., Antal, A. & Paulus, W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul. 5, 505–511 (2012).
Nowak, M. et al. Driving Human Motor Cortical Oscillations Leads to Behaviorally Relevant Changes in Local GABAA Inhibition: A tACS-TMS Study. J. Neurosci. 37, 4481–4492 (2017).
Guerra, A. et al. Phase Dependency of the Human Primary Motor Cortex and Cholinergic Inhibition Cancelation During Beta tACS. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3977–3990 (2016).
Wischnewski, M. et al. NMDA Receptor-Mediated Motor Cortex Plasticity After 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 29, 2924–2931 (2019).
Krishna, V., Sammartino, F. & Rezai, A. A Review of the Current Therapies, Challenges, and Future Directions of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Technology: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA Neurol. 75, 246–254 (2018).
White, P. J., Clement, G. T. & Hynynen, K. Longitudinal and shear mode ultrasound propagation in human skull bone. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32, 1085–1096 (2006).
Zhang, T., Pan, N., Wang, Y., Liu, C. & Hu, S. Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of the Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects on Brain Activity in Human and Animals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 749162 (2021).
Lee, K., Park, T. Y., Lee, W. & Kim, H. A review of functional neuromodulation in humans using low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 14, 407–438 (2024).
FDA. Guidance for industry and FDA staff information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers, https://www.fda.gov/media/71100/download (2008).
Beisteiner, R., Hallett, M. & Lozano, A. M. Ultrasound Neuromodulation as a New Brain Therapy. Adv. Sci. 10, e2205634 (2023).
Blackmore, J., Shrivastava, S., Sallet, J., Butler, C. R. & Cleveland, R. O. Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 1509–1536 (2019).
Prieto, M. L., Firouzi, K., Khuri-Yakub, B. T. & Maduke, M. Activation of Piezo1 but Not Na(V)1.2 Channels by Ultrasound at 43MHz. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44, 1217–1232 (2018).
El Hady, A. & Machta, B. B. Mechanical surface waves accompany action potential propagation. Nat. Commun. 6, 6697 (2015).
Gibson, B. C. et al. Increased Excitability Induced in the Primary Motor Cortex by Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation. Front. Neurol. 9, 1007 (2018).
Legon, W., Bansal, P., Tyshynsky, R., Ai, L. & Mueller, J. K. Transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation of the human primary motor cortex. Sci. Rep. 8, 10007 (2018).
Shamli Oghli, Y. et al. Mechanisms of theta burst transcranial ultrasound induced plasticity in the human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 16, 1135–1143 (2023).
Xia, X. et al. Effects of the motor cortical theta-burst transcranial-focused ultrasound stimulation on the contralateral motor cortex. J. Physiol. 602, 2931–2943 (2024).
Legon, W. et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 322–329 (2014).
Beisteiner, R. et al. Transcranial Pulse Stimulation with Ultrasound in Alzheimer’s Disease-A New Navigated Focal Brain Therapy. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902583 (2020).
Lee, W. et al. Non-invasive transmission of sensorimotor information in humans using an EEG/focused ultrasound brain-to-brain interface. PLoS One 12, e0178476 (2017).
Lee, W. et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex. Sci. Rep. 6, 34026 (2016).
Schimek, N. et al. Repeated Application of Transcranial Diagnostic Ultrasound Towards the Visual Cortex Induced Illusory Visual Percepts in Healthy Participants. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 66 (2020).
Ziebell, P. et al. Inhibition of midfrontal theta with transcranial ultrasound explains greater approach versus withdrawal behavior in humans. Brain Stimul. 16, 1278–1288 (2023).
Sanguinetti, J. L. et al. Transcranial Focused Ultrasound to the Right Prefrontal Cortex Improves Mood and Alters Functional Connectivity in Humans. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 52 (2020).
Folloni, D. et al. Ultrasound modulation of macaque prefrontal cortex selectively alters credit assignment–related activity and behavior. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg7700 (2021).
Nakajima, K. et al. A causal role of anterior prefrontal-putamen circuit for response inhibition revealed by transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans. Cell Rep. 40, 111197 (2022).
Lefaucheur, J.-P. Motor cortex dysfunction revealed by cortical excitability studies in Parkinson’s disease: influence of antiparkinsonian treatment and cortical stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 244–253 (2005).
Müller-Dahlhaus, J. F. M., Liu, Y. & Ziemann, U. Inhibitory circuits and the nature of their interactions in the human motor cortex – a pharmacological TMS study. J. Physiol. 586, 495–514 (2008).
Bareš, M., Kaňovský, P., Klajblová, H. & Rektor, I. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation are impaired in patients with early Parkinson’s disease: a paired TMS study. Eur. J. Neurol. 10, 385–389 (2003).
Ni, Z., Bahl, N., Gunraj, C. A., Mazzella, F. & Chen, R. Increased motor cortical facilitation and decreased inhibition in Parkinson disease. Neurology 80, 1746–1753 (2013).
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents-EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).
Gao, R. Interpreting the electrophysiological power spectrum. J. Neurophysiol. 115, 628–630 (2016).
Jirsa, V. & Müller, V. Cross-frequency coupling in real and virtual brain networks. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 7, 78 (2013).
Bastos, A. M. & Schoffelen, J.-M. A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 175 (2015).
Kasten, F. H. & Herrmann, C. S. Recovering Brain Dynamics During Concurrent tACS-M/EEG: An Overview of Analysis Approaches and Their Methodological and Interpretational Pitfalls. Brain Topogr. 32, 1013–1019 (2019).
Hernandez-Pavon, J. C., Kugiumtzis, D., Zrenner, C., Kimiskidis, V. K. & Metsomaa, J. Removing artifacts from TMS-evoked EEG: A methods review and a unifying theoretical framework. J. Neurosci. Methods 376, 109591 (2022).
Ogawa, S. et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5951–5955 (1992).
Bergmann, T. O. et al. Concurrent TMS-fMRI for causal network perturbation and proof of target engagement. NeuroImage 237, 118093 (2021).
Wagle Shukla, A. & Vaillancourt, D. E. Treatment and physiology in Parkinson’s disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 14, 449 (2014).
Tremblay, F. & Tremblay, L. E. Cortico-motor excitability of the lower limb motor representation: a comparative study in Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 2006–2012 (2002).
Valls-Solé, J. et al. Abnormal facilitation of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 44, 735–741 (1994).
Ammann, C. et al. Cortical disinhibition in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 143, 3408–3421 (2020).
Shirota, Y. et al. Increased facilitation of the primary motor cortex in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 66, 125–129 (2019).
Cantello, R., Tarletti, R. & Civardi, C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. Rev. 38, 309–327 (2002).
Chen, R., Kumar, S., Garg, R. R. & Lang, A. E. Impairment of motor cortex activation and deactivation in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 600–607 (2001).
Cunic, D. et al. Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on motor cortex excitability in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 58, 1665–1672 (2002).
Chen, R., Garg, R. R., Lozano, A. M. & Lang, A. E. Effects of internal globus pallidus stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Neurology 56, 716–723 (2001).
Pollok, B. et al. Motor-cortical oscillations in early stages of Parkinson’s disease. J. Physiol. 590, 3203–3212 (2012).
Stoffers, D. et al. Increased cortico-cortical functional connectivity in early-stage Parkinson’s disease: an MEG study. NeuroImage 41, 212–222 (2008).
Kühn, A. A. et al. Pathological synchronisation in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease relates to both bradykinesia and rigidity. Exp. Neurol. 215, 380–387 (2009).
Muthuraman, M. et al. Cross-frequency coupling between gamma oscillations and deep brain stimulation frequency in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 143, 3393–3407 (2020).
Oswal, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation modulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain J. Neurol. 139, 1482–1496 (2016).
Duchet, B. et al. Average beta burst duration profiles provide a signature of dynamical changes between the ON and OFF medication states in Parkinson’s disease. PLOS Computational Biol. 17, e1009116 (2021).
Kehnemouyi, Y. M. et al. Modulation of beta bursts in subthalamic sensorimotor circuits predicts improvement in bradykinesia. Brain 144, 473–486 (2021).
Tinkhauser, G. et al. The Cumulative Effect of Transient Synchrony States on Motor Performance in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 40, 1571–1580 (2020).
Pauls, K. A. M. et al. Cortical beta burst dynamics are altered in Parkinson’s disease but normalized by deep brain stimulation. NeuroImage 257, 119308 (2022).
Crowell, A. L. et al. Oscillations in sensorimotor cortex in movement disorders: an electrocorticography study. Brain 135, 615–630 (2012).
Jaramillo-Jimenez, A. et al. Spectral features of resting-state EEG in Parkinson’s Disease: A multicenter study using functional data analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 151, 28–40 (2023).
Melgari, J.-M. et al. Alpha and beta EEG power reflects L-dopa acute administration in parkinsonian patients. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6, 302 (2014).
Karekal, A., Miocinovic, S. & Swann, N. C. Novel approaches for quantifying beta synchrony in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Brain Res 240, 991–1004 (2022).
Bange, M. et al. Subthalamic stimulation modulates context-dependent effects of beta bursts during fine motor control. Nat. Commun. 15, 3166 (2024).
Mathiopoulou, V. et al. Modulation of subthalamic beta oscillations by movement, dopamine, and deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. npj Parkinsons Dis. 10, 77 (2024).
de Hemptinne, C. et al. Exaggerated phase-amplitude coupling in the primary motor cortex in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4780–4785 (2013).
Fischer, P. et al. Subthalamic nucleus gamma activity increases not only during movement but also during movement inhibition. eLife 6, e23947 (2017).
Brown, P. Oscillatory nature of human basal ganglia activity: relationship to the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 18, 357–363 (2003).
Litvak, V. et al. Movement-Related Changes in Local and Long-Range Synchronization in Parkinson’s Disease Revealed by Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Intracranial Recordings. J. Neurosci. 32, 10541–10553 (2012).
Lofredi, R. et al. Dopamine-dependent scaling of subthalamic gamma bursts with movement velocity in patients with Parkinson’s disease. eLife 7, e31895 (2018).
Swann, N. C. et al. Gamma Oscillations in the Hyperkinetic State Detected with Chronic Human Brain Recordings in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 36, 6445–6458 (2016).
Cavanagh, J. F. et al. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1462–1467 (2011).
Zavala, B. et al. Subthalamic Nucleus Local Field Potential Activity during the Eriksen Flanker Task Reveals a Novel Role for Theta Phase during Conflict Monitoring. J. Neurosci. 33, 14758–14766 (2013).
Ye, Z., Heldmann, M., Herrmann, L., Brüggemann, N. & Münte, T. F. Altered alpha and theta oscillations correlate with sequential working memory in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Commun. 4, fcac096 (2022).
Androulidakis, A. G. et al. Oscillatory activity in the pedunculopontine area of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 211, 59–66 (2008).
Syrkin-Nikolau, J. et al. Subthalamic neural entropy is a feature of freezing of gait in freely moving people with Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 108, 288–297 (2017).
Luo, C. et al. Reduced functional connectivity in early-stage drug-naive Parkinson’s disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 431–441 (2014).
Putcha, D., Ross, R. S., Cronin-Golomb, A., Janes, A. C. & Stern, C. E. Altered intrinsic functional coupling between core neurocognitive networks in Parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage. Clin. 7, 449–455 (2015).
Tessitore, A. et al. Resting-state brain connectivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease and freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 18, 781–787 (2012).
Wu, T. et al. Regional homogeneity changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1502–1510 (2009).
Herz, D. M., Meder, D., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B. & Siebner, H. R. Brain Motor Network Changes in Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence from Meta-Analytic Modeling. Mov. Disord. 36, 1180–1190 (2021).
Johansson, M. E., Toni, I., Kessels, R. P. C., Bloem, B. R. & Helmich, R. C. Clinical severity in Parkinson’s disease is determined by decline in cortical compensation. Brain 147, 871–886 (2023).
Wagle Shukla, A. et al. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Therapy in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Pm r. 8, 356–366 (2016).
Chung, C. L., Mak, M. K. & Hallett, M. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Promotes Gait Training in Parkinson Disease. Ann. Neurol. 88, 933–945 (2020).
Sun, H. et al. Cortical Disinhibition Drives Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease and an Exploratory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Mov. Disord. 38, 2072–2083 (2023).
Mi, T.-M. et al. High-frequency rTMS over the supplementary motor area improves freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 68, 85–90 (2019).
Formaggio, E. et al. Oscillatory EEG-TMS Reactivity in Parkinson Disease. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 40, 263–268 (2023).
Van Der Werf, Y. D., Sadikot, A. F., Strafella, A. P. & Paus, T. The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. II. Thalamocortical contributions. Exp. Brain Res. 175, 246–255 (2006).
Casarotto, S. et al. Excitability of the supplementary motor area in Parkinson’s disease depends on subcortical damage. Brain Stimul. 12, 152–160 (2019).
Leodori, G. et al. Motor Cortical Network Excitability in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov. Disord. 37, 734–744 (2022).
Leodori, G. et al. Re-emergent Tremor in Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of the Motor Cortex. Mov. Disord. 35, 1002–1011 (2020).
Passera, B. et al. Multi-scale and cross-dimensional TMS mapping: A proof of principle in patients with Parkinson’s disease and deep brain stimulation. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1004763 (2023).
Maidan, I. et al. A multimodal approach using TMS and EEG reveals neurophysiological changes in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 89, 28–33 (2021).
González-García, N. et al. Effects of rTMS on Parkinson’s disease: a longitudinal fMRI study. J. Neurol. 258, 1268–1280 (2011).
Khedr, E. M., Mohamed, K. O., Ali, A. M. & Hasan, A. M. The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease with dementia: Pilot study. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 38, 55–66 (2020).
Huang, P.-L. et al. Increased activation of the caudate nucleus and parahippocampal gyrus in Parkinson’s disease patients with dysphagia after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a case-control study. Neural Regeneration Res. 17, 1051–1058 (2021).
Wen, X. et al. The Cerebellum is Involved in Motor Improvements After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Neuroscience 499, 1–11 (2022).
Chi, S. et al. Sensorimotor network connectivity correlates with motor improvement after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 106, 105218 (2023).
Mi, T.-M. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves Parkinson’s freezing of gait via normalizing brain connectivity. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 6, 16 (2020).
Cardoso, E. F. et al. rTMS treatment for depression in Parkinson’s disease increases BOLD responses in the left prefrontal cortex. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 11, 173–183 (2008).
Lench, D. H. et al. Paired inhibitory stimulation and gait training modulates supplemental motor area connectivity in freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 88, 28–33 (2021).
Flamez, A. et al. Opposite effects of one session of 1 Hz rTMS on functional connectivity between pre-supplementary motor area and putamen depending on the dyskinesia state in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. J. Int. Federation Clin. Neurophysiol. 132, 851–856 (2021).
Lohse, A. et al. Low-frequency transcranial stimulation of pre-supplementary motor area alleviates levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized cross-over trial. Brain Commun. 2, fcaa147 (2020).
Brabenec, L. et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for speech in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 14, 571–578 (2021).
Lang, S. et al. Theta-Burst Stimulation for Cognitive Enhancement in Parkinson’s Disease With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front. Neurol. 11, 584374 (2020).
Schoellmann, A. et al. Anodal tDCS modulates cortical activity and synchronization in Parkinson’s disease depending on motor processing. Neuroimage Clin. 22, 101689 (2019).
Aksu, S. et al. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive impairment? An event-related potentials and neuropsychological assessment study. Neurol. Sci. 43, 4029–4044 (2022).
Pereira, J. B. et al. Modulation of verbal fluency networks by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Stimul. 6, 16–24 (2013).
Krause, V. et al. Cortico-muscular coupling and motor performance are modulated by 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 928 (2014).
Del Felice, A. et al. Personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and physical therapy to treat motor and cognitive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized cross-over trial. NeuroImage. Clin. 22, 101768 (2019).
Nicodemus, N. E. et al. Focused transcranial ultrasound for treatment of neurodegenerative dementia. Alzheimers Dement 5, 374–381 (2019).
Samuel, N. et al. Accelerated Transcranial Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot Study. Mov. Disord. 38, 2209–2216 (2023).
Osou, S. et al. Novel ultrasound neuromodulation therapy with transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) in Parkinson’s disease: a first retrospective analysis. J. Neurol. 271, 1462–1468 (2024).
Shin, D. H., Son, S. & Kim, E. Y. Low-Energy Transcranial Navigation-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Neuropathic Pain: An Exploratory Study. Brain Sci. 13, 1433 (2023).
Cain, J. A. et al. Ultrasonic Deep Brain Neuromodulation in Acute Disorders of Consciousness: A Proof-of-Concept. Brain Sci. 12, 428 (2022).
Riis, T. S. et al. Durable effects of deep brain ultrasonic neuromodulation on major depression: a case report. J. Med Case Rep. 17, 449 (2023).
Wang, Y., Li, F., He, M.-J. & Chen, S.-J. The effects and mechanisms of transcranial ultrasound stimulation combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurol. Sci. 43, 4315–4321 (2022).
Lee, C. C. et al. Pilot study of focused ultrasound for drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia 63, 162–175 (2022).
Bradley, C., Nydam, A. S., Dux, P. E. & Mattingley, J. B. State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 459–475 (2022).
Bergmann, T. O., Lieb, A., Zrenner, C. & Ziemann, U. Pulsed Facilitation of Corticospinal Excitability by the Sensorimotor μ-Alpha Rhythm. J. Neurosci. 39, 10034–10043 (2019).
Wischnewski, M., Haigh, Z. J., Shirinpour, S., Alekseichuk, I. & Opitz, A. The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability. Brain Stimul. 15, 1093–1100 (2022).
Zrenner, C., Desideri, D., Belardinelli, P. & Ziemann, U. Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 11, 374–389 (2018).
Little, S. et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 74, 449–457 (2013).
Tinkhauser, G. et al. The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease. Brain J. Neurol. 140, 1053–1067 (2017).
Moraud, E. M., Tinkhauser, G., Agrawal, M., Brown, P. & Bogacz, R. Predicting beta bursts from local field potentials to improve closed-loop DBS paradigms in Parkinson’s patients. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018, 3766–3796 (2018).
Postuma, R. B. et al. The new definition and diagnostic criteria of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 15, 546–548 (2016).
Thenganatt, M. A. & Jankovic, J. Parkinson Disease Subtypes. JAMA Neurol. 71, 499–504 (2014).
Horn, A. & Kühn, A. A. Lead-DBS: A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations. NeuroImage 107, 127–135 (2015).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41531-025-00908-1 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
[ad_2]