Biden meets with top Democrats on new voting rights proposal

[ad_1]

President Biden and top Congressional Democrats are expected to meet at the White House on Friday to discuss their party’s faltering efforts to pass key voting rights legislation, according to two congressional aides familiar with the plans.

Biden’s meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer of New York comes at a crucial moment, as activists push the president to use his power and Democrats’ control of Congress to protect voting rights while they have the opportunity. Republican-led states have enacted at least 30 new laws containing a raft of new restrictions on voting, and GOP senators have also blocked consideration of a Democratic bill that would enforce sweeping federal mandates intended to bypass them.

Party leaders don’t have many options to break the deadlock. In June, Republicans successfully disrupted the Democratic electoral legislation, called “Act for the People,” by blocking it. Democrats’ hopes of changing crippling Senate rules to bypass Republicans have crystallized with a few naysayers within the party continuing to oppose such a move. And their window for legislative action is narrow.

A White House spokesman declined to comment on the meeting. The two congressional aides, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the plans, cautioned that a date for the meeting was still being worked out.

Democrats are close to finalizing a reduced bill that activists hope will be a major blow in the battle over disruption. The party is also preparing legislation to strengthen the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and lawmakers have debated including voting provisions in the $3.5 trillion budget plan being introduced in the Senate, which they can push unilaterally over Republican opposition. But the Republican Party is largely opposed to all three.

Minnesota Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar confirmed Thursday that a small group of Democratic senators met to come up with a revised bill that could be passed in the coming days. Among them was Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, a moderate who rejected some of the more expansive proposals in Act for the People and was resolutely dismissive of keeping the disruption intact.

“This is not one of those ‘oh, maybe we’ll get it done,'” Ms Klobuchar said Thursday during a call hosted by SiX Action, a progressive group, saying the emerging measure would have provisions on manipulation of electoral districts and voting by mail and automatic voter registration. “We are about to get an agreement on this law.”

There is no indication that an agreement among a small group of Democrats would attract any greater Republican support than previous proposals. But activists and progressives want to see the revised measure put to a vote before the Senate leaves for Washington for the August recess, predicting that it will fail and intensify pressure to dismantle the disruption.

Mr. Schumer has yet to stick to a timetable, and it’s not clear if he wants to fight a full-blown stalling battle just as he and Biden are trying to maneuver a bipartisan infrastructure bill through the Senate.

The revised election law is built around a rough framework that Mr. Manchin introduced earlier this year. States are expected to provide 15 days of early in-person voting, including at least two Sundays; a national expansion of mail voting; an end to the partisan geographic division of congressional districts; a national requirement for voter identification; and campaign finance terms that may require higher political action committees to reveal the identities of major donors.

The drafters of the bill also plan to include language intended to undermine state laws in places like Georgia that they believe would allow Republican elected officials to subvert election results in favor of their candidates. Federal lawmakers specifically want to make it more difficult for their state counterparts to fire local election officials and more difficult for partisan poll monitors to intimidate voters and election workers. They also want to make the process of challenging anyone’s ability to register to vote more difficult.

[ad_2]