Powerful Conservative Party committee in talks with Boris Johnson amid leadership rumors

[ad_1]

A delegation of Conservative MPs have held talks with Boris Johnson amid speculation that MPs may be dissatisfied with his performance as prime minister.

In an unusual move, the 1922 Executive Director of the Commission met the Prime Minister en masse at 10 Downing Street.

It came as a senior Conservative MP told The Independent the Prime Minister risks challenging his leadership in the new year unless he stops his string of recent policy mistakes.

Party sources have downplayed reports that as many as a dozen MPs sent letters of no confidence in the Prime Minister to 1922 President Sir Graham Brady, with Whips saying they had no information about this happening.

A total of 54 characters are required to start a leadership election, but Sir Graham is always very silent about the number he has obtained until the threshold is crossed.

Brady confirmed today that the Executive has met the Prime Minister at number 10 but declined to comment on their discussions.

The meeting sparked inevitable speculation that the 13-member committee wanted to raise MPs’ concerns about a hot month for the prime minister, which has seen Torres slip behind Labor in the opinion polls after a series of self-inflicted blows, starting with a failed bailout. Vice from punishment for corruption and also in dealing with bad launches of railroad and welfare policies.

Earlier, the prime minister’s official spokesperson downplayed reports of tensions between Johnson and Chancellor Rishi Sunak.

“They continue to work very well together on all levels,” the spokesperson said.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiamh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1sZWFkZXJzaGlwLWJyYWR5LTE5MjItY29tbWl0dGVlLWIxOTY0MjQ0Lmh0bWzSAW5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pbmRlcGVuZGVudC5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrL3BvbGl0aWNzL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tbGVhZGVyc2hpcC1icmFkeS0xOTIyLWNvbW1pdHRlZS1iMTk2NDI0NC5odG1sP2FtcA?oc=5

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

[ad_2]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts