[ad_1]
NEW YORK (Associated Press) — A new analysis of blood samples from 24,000 Americans taken early last year is the latest and largest study to suggest the novel coronavirus emerged in the United States in December 2019 — weeks before cases were first identified by health officials. .
The analysis is not definitive, and some experts remain skeptical, but federal health officials are increasingly accepting of a timeline in which small numbers of COVID-19 infections may have occurred in the United States before the world became aware of a dangerous new virus emerging in China. .
“The studies are pretty consistent,” said Natalie Thornberg of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
There may have been very rare and sporadic cases here earlier than we were aware of. “It was not widespread and did not spread until late February,” said Thornberg, principal investigator on the respiratory virus immunology team at the CDC.
Vermont ranks first in achieving its 80% vaccination target; Lifts Covid-19 restrictions weeks early
She added that these findings underscore the need for countries to work together and identify newly emerging viruses as quickly and collaboratively as possible.
The pandemic coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China in late 2019. Officially, the first identified US infection was a traveler – a Washington state man who returned from Wuhan on January 15 and sought help at a clinic on January 19.
CDC officials initially said that the spark that started the outbreak in the United States arrived during a three-week window from mid-January to early February. But research since then — including some by the CDC — has suggested a small number of infections occurred earlier.
A study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published in December 2020, which analyzed 7,000 samples of American Red Cross blood donations, indicated that the virus infected some Americans as early as mid-December 2019.
The latest study, published online Tuesday in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, was carried out by a team that includes researchers at the National Institutes of Health. They analyzed blood samples from more than 24,000 people across the country, collected in the first three months of 2020 as part of a long-term study called “All Of Us” that seeks to track one million Americans over years to study health.
Like the CDC study, these researchers looked for antibodies in the blood that are taken as evidence of coronavirus infection, and can be detected as early as two weeks after a person is first infected.
Seven of the nine study participants — three from Illinois and one each from Massachusetts, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — were infected earlier than any COVID-19 case originally reported in those states, the researchers say.
One of the Illinois cases became infected on Christmas Eve, said Keri Altoff, associate professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and lead author of the study.
In an effort to relieve coronavirus stress, a Chicago man has been jumping into Lake Michigan for 365 days in a row
It can be difficult to distinguish between antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and antibodies that fight other coronaviruses, including those that cause the common cold. Researchers in the NIH and CDC studies used multiple types of tests to reduce false positives, but some experts say their 2019 positive results could still be infection with other coronaviruses rather than the pandemic strain.
William Hanage, of Harvard University, said: “While it is entirely plausible that the virus was introduced to the United States much earlier than is usually estimated, this does not mean that this is necessarily strong enough evidence to change the way we think about this. matter.” University expert in disease dynamics.
NIH researchers have not yet followed up with study participants to see if any of them had traveled outside the United States prior to infection. But they found it worth noting that the seven do not live in or near New York City or Seattle, where the first wave of US cases were concentrated.
“The question is how and where the virus took the seeds,” Altov said. She added that the new study indicates that “it is likely to be published in multiple places in our country.”
___
The Associated Press’s Department of Health and Science receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Division of Science Education. AP is solely responsible for all content.
.
[ad_2]
Picture Credit!