[ad_1]
Top media headlines for June 21
Reporters and activists scramble to judge Florida Pride motorcade crash ahead of investigation, Washington Post to portray Biden as ‘deeply Catholic’, and CNN rips apart over misleading headlines about purge of General Assembly voter rolls around today’s media headlines
The Washington Post on Monday came under fire for a report on the apparent “evolution” that prominent Democrats have made when it comes to voter identity laws.
Last week, Senator Joe Manchin, DW.Va. He tried to drive his own voting rights legislation in hopes of garnering some bipartisan support, which appears bleak despite being a more benign turn of the Liberal for the People Act.
However, former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams raised eyebrows by suggesting she was open to the Manchin bill, which would require a voter ID.
“No one objected to having to prove who you would vote for,” Abrams said on CNN last week. “It has been a part of our nation’s history since the voting began.
USA TODAY MODIFY STACEY ABRAMS OP-ED PUBLISHED BEFORE MLB DRAW GAME IN ATLANTA, SUPPORT WATERS DOWN BOYCOTT
But as the Georgian National Council noted over the weekend, the Georgia Democrat had a very different situation just two months ago, associating voter identity requirements with “Jim Crow.”
“Voters without a driver’s license or official ID should turn in their personal information and risk identity theft just to get an absentee vote,” Abrams said while connecting her website “Stop Jim Crow 2” in opposition to Georgia’s election reform legislation. “Then there are the 200,000 voters in Georgia who don’t have an ID and a punitive free ID, which isn’t free when you factor in the cost of transportation and the cost of an underlined document.”
The Washington Post seemed to vindicate her and Democrats widely, making the headline, “Stacy Abrams and the Democrats’ Evolution on Voter Identity.”
“It remains unclear exactly what will happen with Senator Joe Manchin III’s centrist proposal on voting rights…but no matter what happens to the bill, Manchin’s proposal has moved the needle in one important way: to indicate a loosening of the key Democrats on voter ID cards. ‘,” Chief Postal Correspondent Aaron Blake wrote. One of the carrots for Republicans in the Mansion proposal is to provide voter ID. Republicans have pushed voter ID aggressively at the state level in recent years. But rather than simply describing the Mansion voter ID proposal as a concession, some major Democrats have suggested that they don’t really object to That – or the broader concept – at all.”
Blake outlined the current positions of Abrams and Senator Raphael Warnock, Democrats, who claimed they had never opposed voter identification laws and acknowledged that critics of the right accused Democrats of “hypocrisy and distortion.”
Post-Majdal Washington slams Jon Stewart to advance WUHAN LAB-LEAK theory: Celebrities are not ‘experts’
Blake defended Democrats: “There are some real nuances in these earlier comments — and nuances in voter identification proposals, which Republicans in the recent past have sought to cover up.” “Both Abrams and Warnock stressed last week that they do not oppose an out-of-control voter ID, but only oppose certain types of more restrictive voter IDs such as those proposed by Republicans in recent years. Manchin’s proposal is noticeably less stringent than most of his efforts Republicans, allowing voters to file things like utility bills in place of ID cards.”
Blake later described the color shift as an “important rhetorical concession from some major Democrats” and that while they didn’t want to make it “look like they’ve given up on their previous principles,” they “appear increasingly eager to fight more win-win battles” amid polls showing overwhelming support. Voter ID requirements.
Washington Post: ‘Correction’ of 2020 publication issues around Tom Cotton’s theory of COVID LAB-LEAK case claim ‘dismantled’
Critics have criticized Washington’s framing of so-called “evolution” on social media.
Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy responded with “LOL.”
“Republicans are fickle. Democrats are evolving,” Brent Scheer, Washington executive editor Free Beacon wrote on Twitter.
“They called these laws Jim Crow. They are either shameless liars or ‘evolve’ on evil. There are no other options. Don’t try to dress this up. Liars or evil. Which is it?” Political strategist Luke Thompson wrote. “Imagine trying to carry water for these crooks, trying to cover up their basic insanity with ‘nuances.’ What an absolute shame.”
Political commentator Drew Holden, known for his series of tweets calling out the media, criticized The Washington Post for being “not true.”[ing] From the “Democrats”.
CLICK HERE FOR FOX NEWS APP
“The piece describes the new tone from the Democrats as an important rhetorical concession, and I can’t really imagine any member of the media treating this bald-faced hypocrisy in the same way if Abrams had an R after her name,” Holden wrote. “Abrams and Democrats have lied about voter ID cards, slandered fellow Republicans as racists, and are now backing down because the ballot has shown — once again — that the American people support voter identification laws… Yet this naked, cowardly effort to rewrite history was treated by Washington Others, not as a disgusting political blow, but “Democrats are trying to focus on the art of the possible while not wanting to look like they’ve given up on their previous principles.”
“Spoiler alert: There are no ‘prior principles’ but a desire for power and a willingness to smear your opposition with the dirtiest – in English to get it.”
[ad_2]
Picture Credit!