[ad_1]
Few of the audience who applauded Joe Biden could have questioned the veracity of his warning of a grave threat to American democracy.
But they may have withdrew with lingering doubts about his ability to meet the moment or respond to fears that even the office of the presidency would become politically impotent in the face of the challenge.
“We face the most important test of our democracy since the Civil War,” Biden said in a speech Tuesday in Philadelphia, referring to the mid-19th century conflict that left more than 600,000 people dead. “The Confederacy at that time did not penetrate the Capitol as the rebels did on January 6th.”
And the president added plainly: “I am not saying this to alarm you, I am saying it. I am saying this because you must be alarmed.”
However, while voting rights activists have praised Biden for correctly diagnosing the disease, albeit somewhat belatedly, he has been criticized for failing to offer a cure. He concluded his 24-minute speech with the advice, “We have to move!” But it did not provide a battle plan.
At stake are the basic principles of democracy: who has the right to vote, how that right is exercised, and who decides which vote counts. Since Biden’s victory over Donald Trump last November — an outcome Trump and many Republicans refuse to accept, citing bogus allegations of fraud — that right has come under coordinated and relentless attack like never before in modern times.
This year, 17 states enacted 28 new laws to make it more difficult for people to vote. Nearly 400 voter suppression bills have been introduced in 48 states, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Some of the measures are intended to reverse the expansion of mail-in voting that took place in the 2020 election due to the coronavirus pandemic. Others attempt to enhance voter identification requirements, reduce early voting hours and locations and poll withdrawals or increase the risk of voter intimidation by polling observers.
Activists say people of color, the young and the poor will be the biggest losers. These groups are generally more likely to vote Democrats than Republicans. Civil rights leaders met Biden at the White House earlier this month and appeared to have convinced him that “the 21st century attack on Jim Crow is real,” as he put it on Tuesday.
The speech he gave in Philadelphia, the cradle of American democracy, was a “good first step,” according to Chris Scott, chief policy officer of the group Democracy for America. “I think that’s what a lot of us have advocated, especially in the progressive movement,” he said.
“The part that really stuck out to me was calling Congressman John Lewis in saying, ‘Freedom is not a state; It is not a country. He did.” That is why I say the letter is the first part but we are asking him to take action on this.”
Biden did not once mention in his remarks the Washington, D.C. version of the F-word: crash. This vague Senate procedural rule enables the minority to obstruct debate on the legislation. Last month, Republicans used stalling to block an Act for the People, which would set national voting standards that could block some of the restrictions imposed by red states.
Senator Kirsten Senema of Arizona said he opposes repealing the blocking Senate ruling. Photo: Jim Lo Scalzo / EPA
Former President Barack Obama has called stalling a “Jim Crow relic,” a reference to its long history of frustrating civil rights legislation. Biden, who has served in the Senate for 36 years, could push for his removal or reform from his bully pulpit, by making the case privately to skeptical Democratic senators such as Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kirsten Sinema of Arizona.
Scott continued, “We can’t pass any meaningful reforms as long as we still have this disruption in place, so one of the biggest problems is seeing him be able to have the capacity of some of his predecessors. I think of Lyndon Johnson and how he was able to leverage his experience in the US Senate to make His party members agree with the matter.
“When we have members like Joe Manchin, like Kyrsten Sinema, we have to really get them to align because what we see is Mitch McConnell doing what he does best. Whether he’s majority leader or minority leader or not, he always finds a way to constrain whatever progress we want already achieved.”
Concerns were expressed during the Democratic primary campaign that Biden is a boxer rather than a fighter, and his belief in the age of political chivalry and partisanship is not appropriate for Trump’s bloodsport. On Tuesday he urged the passage of both an Act for the People – a “patriotic duty” – and the John Lewis Act to Enhance Voting Rights, but both appear doomed under current Senate rules.
In an interview with Reuters news agency following the speech, civil rights leader Al Sharpton noted that Biden did not mention the disruption, adding that he had just spoken with the president. And he just said to me now, ‘Al, we’re still working through where we’re going to be in it. “Not committed yet.”
Biden’s negativity on the issue was eroded by more than 50 Democratic lawmakers who suddenly flew in from Texas in an attempt to derail Republicans’ efforts to pass the state’s voting restrictions. The group came to Washington, gave impassioned speeches outside the US Capitol, and met Kamala Harris, the vice president who is leading the White House’s efforts on voting rights.
Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of the People’s Progressive Movement Invisibly, said: “It’s an inspiration, it’s exactly what needs to happen. Everyone in the country should look at what he’s doing and ask themselves, How do I fight just as hard for the right to vote as they do? Those Democrats in Texas?
“First, they’re blocking the legislative process, but two of them are taking a stand and really bringing this fight to Washington and they’re seeking help from the federal government and now we all have to heed that cry.”
Greenberg also urged Democrats to be similarly aggressive about disruption. “Both Mansion and Cinema, although they are clear that they won’t cancel the disruption, have both in the past had discussions about fixing it to try to get it back to its true purpose, from hanging talk to things like having quorum limits over time.
Congresswoman Joyce Petty, center, the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, and other activists led a peaceful demonstration for voting rights at the Hart Senate office building in Washington on Thursday. Betty and eight others were arrested. Photo: J Scott Applewhite/AP
“These are the things the Democratic Caucus should be talking about, because the idea that we would essentially leave our democracy unprotected because of this legislative loophole in the late eighteenth century is absurd.”
She added, “Essentially, President Biden can say it out loud. He hasn’t yet called for reform, so he said, ‘I’m doing everything I can’ when he literally didn’t call for the legislative reform that would be necessary to pass a law for the people.” We pass the smell test.”
Some Democrats are looking for creative ways to break the deadlock. James Claiburn, the House majority whip, proposed creating a stall portion of legislation applicable to election law or other constitutional changes, which would give Democrats a way to pass their voting rights bills by a simple majority, rather than 60 votes. .
Claiborne, who arguably did more than anyone else to secure Biden’s victory in the Democratic primary, told reporters on Wednesday: “I think President Biden should think about it. All I want him to do is express his support for her.”
Biden also argued that legislation is not the only tool, noting that the Department of Justice will defy the onslaught of restrictions on voting rights and focus on dismantling racial discrimination laws. One such intervention is already taking place in Georgia.
But the issue continues to threaten democratic unity and highlight the limits of the presidency – or the man who currently holds the position. “In terms of voting rights, President Joe Biden has failed to meet this moment,” Adam Gentelson, executive director of lobby group Battle Born Collective, said in a statement.
There is a wide gap between his speech and his leadership. In his speech, he described the Tories’ attack on our democracy as an existential threat, but refused to agree to the obvious solution, which is to pass voting rights legislation and stall reform to do so, if necessary.”
|
Sources 2/ https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91cy1uZXdzLzIwMjEvanVsLzE3L2pvZS1iaWRlbi1kZW1vY3JhY3ktdm90aW5nLXJpZ2h0cy1zZW5hdGUtZmlsaWJ1c3RlctIBY2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91cy1uZXdzLzIwMjEvanVsLzE3L2pvZS1iaWRlbi1kZW1vY3JhY3ktdm90aW5nLXJpZ2h0cy1zZW5hdGUtZmlsaWJ1c3Rlcg?oc=5 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
[ad_2]