Are the world’s cricket and Team India used as political tools? Ten questions to be answered

File image of Indian skipper Virat Kohl. Photo: AP

Last Sunday, Dubai International Cricket Stadium turned political advertising into Times Square. As India and Pakistan battled in the opening match of the T20 World Cup, spectacular propaganda spread to the collective psyche of millions, reassuring and confusing alike.

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement succeeded in a public coup on the Indian subcontinent. The Indian cricket team suddenly knelt thousands of miles away against black racial discrimination, while Hindus and Sikhs in their own Kashmir and neighboring Bangladesh are slaughtered, extinct in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Questions are delayed.

Why did the Indian Cricket Control Board (BCCI) allow this strange political ritual?

Why did Team India coach Ravi Shastri and skipper Virat Kohli gladly agree to the International Cricket Council (ICC) proposal?

Why should India, which generates by far the most cricket revenue, make bids from the ICC so easily?

Doesn’t the Indian cricket leadership know that the BLM is funded by forces like the Open Society Foundation and the Ford Foundation? The Open Society Foundation is funded by George Soros, a Hungarian-American Tycoon who has openly pledged $ 1 billion to overthrow governments like Narendra Mod and who is waging a global war against the concept of the nation-state. India banned the Ford Foundation from funding anti-government and anti-democratic activities because it is financially cunning and finances far-left movements around the world while using the name of Henry Ford, one of the world’s greatest capitalists and entrepreneurs.

Aren’t the Indian cricket management and players aware that BLM supporters wanted to tear down a statue of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in London by branding him a racist?

While we would accept that fighting racism in the West is more important to Team India than protesting against Hindus in Bangladesh, supporting the BLM means joining a particular, politically funded group, not really a broader issue. Should the national team support a political group, for whatever reason?

How different does this support for the BLM, a movement irrelevant to India, differ from the Muslims of Gandhi and India, who strangely embraced the fervor of the 1920s to establish an Islamic caliphate in Turkey and later skillfully named it the “Khilafat movement” to sound local and secular?

Why did Pakistani Mohammad Rizwan offer namaz in the middle of the game? The evening prayer time, or Maghreb, begins in Dubai at about 5:47 p.m. The match started at 6pm. Rizwan could have prayed before the match or between shifts.

Former Pakistani pacifier Waqar Younis openly made a communal remark in which he praised Rizwan for offering namaz in front of Hindus. Generations of Pakistani cricketers, such as current Prime Minister Imran Khan, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Saqlain Mustaq, Mohammed Yousuf, Shoaib Akhtar, Shahid Afridi, Sohail Tanveer and others, have boasted in videos of trying to turn other cricketers or take the saints forward Hind against India. Has the BCCI asked players to take a knee, or more importantly, demanded sanctions against this cricket jihad?

Almost every former Pak cricketer participated / is involved in the conversion of non-Muslim players to Islam. Check the media section @pakistan_untold know why each team should think twice before visiting Pak. Inzamam, Saqlain, Mushtaq, Imran, Md Yusuf, Saeed Anwar – ALL worked for Jihad. View.

– Pakistan Untold (@pakistan_untold) September 21, 2021

Why is Indian cricket captain Virat Kohli and his wife actor Anushka Sharma selectively campaigning against Diwal’s biscuits, but not against the massacres of Bakrid?