President leaves office during investigation of double inference allegations; geoscientist fined; teacher claims someone else’s papers are his – Retraction Watch

[ad_1]

Before presenting this week’s weekend readings, one question: do you like our weekly roundup? If so, we might really need your help. Would you consider a tax-deductible donation to support the weekend readings and our daily work? Thanks in advance.

The week at Retraction Watch featured:

Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 items stands at 199. There are now over 31,000 retractions in our database, which now feeds retraction alerts in EndNote, Papers and Zotero. And have you seen our ranking of the authors with the most retractions lately?

Here’s what was going on elsewhere (some of these may be chargeable, have limited access, or require free registration to read):

“LSU Health President Steps Down As Under Investigation Denies Double Deduction.” The move follows allegations by Retraction Watch. “Germany’s top geoscientist fined after facing fraudulent expense report charges.” More details here. The article on autism stem cells ‘pay to participate’ has been retracted. “Jonathan Pruitt” Removed from the Canada 150 Chairs website, funding ceased. A professor in Turkey claimed that another researcher’s work was his because their names are similar. In the latest “hoax”, an education advocacy group checks facts a newspaper failed to do.[W]We develop methods for manufacturing detection in biomedical research and show that machine learning can be used to detect fraud in large-scale omics experiments. facilitate the production and dissemination of false or misleading scientific information. “Former U. Dean Temple was convicted of tampering with data for national rankings. [University of Ibadan] Speaker. “” There are many examples of waste throughout the research process, from the questions asked to the comprehensiveness and transparency of how completed research is communicated and disseminated. “” International organizations find [Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Vice Chancellor] guilty of plagiarism. “More transparency in the peer review process will help researchers study peer review and improve its quality and fairness.” “The article by the dean of the university was withdrawn for plagiarism. with your thumb still pressing on one side of the scale, you run the risk of error. “Can we recognize these negative results as important publications?” credit. “” Human geneticists limit the use of the term ‘race’ in their articles. “” Plagiarism continues to be rife in public universities. Foundation Prize for Promoting Quality in Research. Elisabeth Bik awarded the John Maddox Prize “for standing up for science in the face of harassment, intimidation and lawsuits”. [social sciences and humanities] journals preferred the advantages of anonymous peer review over open peers and recognized the power they hold in the publication process… “The leading beagle breeder for research criticized by well- inspectors to be animal. ” “Therefore, the journal reporting guidelines by themselves are not a silver bullet in fixing the gaps in the documentation of biomedical resources …” “The concealment of the identity of the principal investigator only partially fills the success gap between white and African-American or black researchers in NIH grant applications. ”A skeptic debunks a story of reincarnation. We would like to hire a full-time editor in 2022, explains our Ivan Oransky in a letter to the readers. Can you help us raise funds?

Do you like the retraction watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution through PayPal or Square, or a tax-deductible monthly donation through Paypal to support our work, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader or subscribe. you to our daily digest. If you find a withdrawal that is not in our database, you can let us know here. For feedback or feedback, email us at [email protected].

Related

[ad_2]