Mass strikes on Ukraine are a desperate answer to Putins critics at home | Ukraine

[ad_1]

The were ordinary Ukrainians: those who died at the busy victims intersection of Volodymyrska and Shevchenko streets in Kyiv, at a downtown playground, or the hundreds of thousands now in homes without light, water and heat in cities across the country due to a barrage of Russian cruise missiles.

But Vladimir Putins mass strikes on Monday were also a desperate answer to his military critics at home, to the fact that Russias invasion is failing, and to his own wounded pride after the Crimean Bridge, a pet project, was rocked by an explosion this weekend .

What he is doing now is trivial revenge, said Andrei Kolesnikov, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Personal revenge as well.

For months, Russian war pundits, armchair generals, military bloggers and others have been clamouring for all-out war against Ukraine. And, as the horrific images began to appear from Ukrainian cities such as Kyiv, Lviv and Dnipro of bodies in the streets and plumes of smoke rising from city centres, they were satisfied for a moment.

Ukraine map Monday

We warned you, Zelenskiy, that Russia still had not begun in earnest, wrote Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-installed head of Chechnya, who had criticized top army generals in recent weeks. Now Im 100% satisfied with how the [war] is being waged.

When Putin led a session of his security council on Monday, he presented the attack as a case of Russia demanding action following the explosion that rocked the Crimean Bridge, a symbol of Russian prestige and of his control of the peninsula.

It was impossible to leave this kind of crime without any response, Putin said in televised remarks, blaming the blast on Ukrainian intelligence.

Ukrainian officials quickly pointed out that Russia had been launching strikes against civilian infrastructure since the beginning of the war. Russias strike on Monday was the largest barrage against cities since 24 February, but not a fundamental change to the war.

No, Putin was not provoked to unleash missile terror by Crimea Bridge, wrote Dmytro Kuleba, Ukraines foreign minister. Russia had been constantly hitting Ukraine with missiles before the bridge, too. Putin is desperate because of battlefield defeats and uses missile terror to try to change the pace of war in his favor.

In his short speech, Putin claimed the strikes were made at the request of the defense ministry. If true, that would make it one of the first decisions enacted by Gen Sergei Surovikin, the new unified Russian battlefield commander who has been dubbed General Armageddon for his hardline and unorthodox approach to waging war.

I am not surprised to see what is happening this morning in Kyiv. Surovikin is absolutely ruthless, with little regard for human life, a former defense ministry official who has worked with him told the Guardian. I am afraid his hands will be completely covered in Ukrainian blood.

Cars on fire after a missile attack on Kyiv, Ukraine, 10 October. Photograph: Valentin Ogirenko/Reuters

At the same time, Putin said that attacks such as Mondays mass barrage of missiles would be reserved as responses to strikes on Russian territory. Whether or not that is true, the statement is one that will anger hardliners who believed they were witnessing Russias new, all-out approach to this war.

We must hope that this is not a one-time act of revenge but a new system of waging war, Alexander Kots, a hawkish military reporter for the pro-Kremlin Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper, wrote before Putin spoke. Across the entire Ukrainian government. Until they lose the ability to function.

Archie Bland and Nimo Omer take you through the top stories and what they mean, free every weekday morning

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Whatever praise Putin has earned from the military critics by using cruise missiles to target civilian infrastructure in Ukraine may be short-lived.

Russian public opinion wants mass attacks and the total destruction of infrastructure that can be used by the Ukrainian army, claimed Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser and political commentator. He, like other pro-Kremlin figures, have mostly ignored the fact that the strikes also targeted ordinary civilians.

The complexities of the Kremlins internal decision-making on the war remain opaque.

While the infighting among Russian officials has been palpable in recent weeks, Putin has also made clear that the war is deeply personal for him, and often launches into tirades on Ukrainian statehood and history that put him in line with some of the most hardline elements of his government.

Perhaps it is important for Putin to respond to the discontent of hawks and ultra-conservatives. But I would not exaggerate their influence on the decisions he makes, said Kolesnikov. He is himself the most important hawk and ultra-conservative. This war is his personal war with Ukraine and, as it turned out eight months later, with the world order constructed after 1945 and 1991.

One theory in Moscow is that Putin has sought to reduce anger over the defense ministries conduct of the war by appointing a new military commander with a brutal reputation to show that the military now has carte blanche.

Surovikin is in favor with hardliners. He maintains a good working relationship with the Wagner private military company, said Gleb Irisov, a former air force lieutenant who worked with Surovikin up to 2020, and his appointment was welcomed by top critics of the war effort, including Kadyrov and the Wagner head, Yevgeny Prigozhin.

[Surovikin] is very cruel but also a competent commander, said Irisov. But he won’t be able to solve all the problems. Russia is short on weapons and manpower, he added.

[ad_2]