[ad_1]
What better way to ruin someone’s post vacation shine than another bill shock when the mind-blowing costs are presented in black and white on the way home.
Like Britain’s accession to the European Union, roaming charges were supposed to be a thing of the past. But if there was one advantage to being part of the continental bloc that even Nigel Farage would surely recognize, it was that Brussels did away with roaming charges years ago as it sought to create a single market in the region. telecommunications industry.
And that’s how he was supposed to stay. Despite warnings from anti-Brexit MPs that a return to heavy sanctions was inevitable once Britain left the EU, Brexiteers called it alarming. The industry also rejected the suggestion. Indeed, it was only recently that BT assured its customers that it had no intention of reintroducing them now that Britain was free from Brussels.
This is particularly cynical opportunism on BT’s part. EE said the move would support investments in customer service and its network, but that’s what the Chancellors’ Super Tax Deduction was designed for.
Indeed, this is precisely what Jansen cited as a major factor in BT’s recent decision to accelerate the deployment of fiber-optic broadband to 5 million homes above the 20 million previously announced, so why is the need to suffocate consumers too? Although foreign operators charge rent to use their networks, BT and its competitors charge a large margin on the other end.
[ad_2]
picture credit