Biden has right to criticize Press Telegram licensing rules

[ad_1]

President Joe Biden has the right to request professional licensing practices for an overdue exam, as he did last week. Professional licenses, which are superficially aimed at protecting the public, generally only protect the bottom of the laid-off workers by crushing competition.

Overly onerous professional license requirements that hamper the movement of workers and reduce wages also limit competition, a White House executive order Biden read. “Today, nearly 30% of jobs in the United States require a license, an increase from less than 5% in the 1950s.

This prevents some people from working and makes it difficult to travel between states. “

To address this issue, President Biden “encouraged” the Federal Trade Commission to “ban unnecessary business licensing restrictions that hamper economic liquidity.”

The full scope of this order in practice is not yet known, but there is no doubt that the President has the right to pursue anti-competitive, anti-worker and anti-consumer professional licensing practices.

Five years ago, the Little Hoover commission in California stated: [of occupational licensing] It is often a political activity rather than a careful consideration of how best to protect consumers. “

This applies nationwide, but especially here in California, it allows jobs with incomes well below the state average. The Legal Training and Research Institute says California has approved 76 of 102 low-income occupations assessed nationally. By comparison, as of 2017, New York has licensed 41 of the same profession, while Texas has licensed 37.

Likewise, in 2018, the Archbridge Institute noted that professional licenses correlated with reduced economic mobility and increased income inequality. This is because the licenses act as a barrier for many workers who may want to work in a particular field, but they often fail to overcome an arbitrary chain of requirements to obtain a license.

A professional license also sanctions low-income people twice. First, by making it more difficult for low-income people to find a job, and second by increasing the cost of services.

It should be noted that California is consistently hostile to licensing reforms. In 2018, former Senator Mike Morel, R-Rancho Cucamonga, sought to exempt shampoos and hairdressers from licensing. He was killed by the committee with 14-3 votes.

Likewise, Senator John Mullach, R-Costa Mesa, exempts certain tasks from licensing requirements or allows workers licensed from other states to work in California (and vice versa). Many efforts to promote sexuality have been killed by Sacramento.

For states that take great pride in being innovative and progressive, California is dramatically outdated and regressive due to political overflows of state power and vested interests.

I hope President Joe Biden and President Barack Obama also focus on professional licensing as an issue. The answer is clear. If your profession really requires a license, keep it. Otherwise, throw it away. Limit.

Biden Right to Criticize Telegram Press Licensing Rules Source Link Biden Right to Criticize Telegram Press Licensing Rules

[ad_2]