Industry backs PPI’s criticism of pension system adequacy

[ad_1]

Occupational Pensions asked Pensions Buzz respondents for their thoughts on the July 1 PPI comments, which follow the release of its publication, The Future Life Report.

The report – which found 38% of adults have seen their financial situation worsen since the start of 2020 – saw PPI criticize the pension system for not doing enough to reduce gender and racial disparities. and monitor changing attitudes and developments in society.

Exactly half of the administrators, pension administrators, consultants, actuaries and lawyers polled with the PP this week said they agree with the PPI. This was ahead of 22% who didn’t and 28% who weren’t sure.

One respondent said there was a “huge imbalance in intergenerational equity” that needed to be corrected, adding that there was also too much focus on short-term solvency measures in the benefit system. Defined Contribution (DC) and poor liquidity allocations in the Defined Contribution (DC) space. .

“Our system still has a 20th century model trying to solve the challenges of the 21st century,” added another.

A third said: “There are not enough new ideas on boards, the composition of which does not reflect membership.

Many respondents also agreed that a better way to support savings for those whose careers are affected by caregiving duties was vital.

“The pension system and employers have not caught up with the concept of people working temporarily, part-time and in multiple jobs, or changing jobs frequently,” said one expert. “It must be an easier and better experience for members to consolidate their defined contribution funds into one pension plan every time they change employers.”

They added: “Neither have employers and government realized that funding for defined contribution pensions has to be proportional to what they would have paid to properly fund old defined benefit agreements, assuming markets investment even benign. Current levels of EI are insufficient. “

“There is more than one ‘society’,” noted another. “Trying to adopt a one-size-fits-all model will not work.”

But an expert who disagreed with the PPI said pensions “are to provide for retirement and not to solve societal problems.”

“The pension plan is only part of the whole,” they continued. “Keep the pension simple, put all the pieces together, then see what you have and if overall it’s fit for purpose. “

“The PPI got a feel for what it would like the needs of society to be,” said another respondent. “He then adapted that data to his conclusion.”

A third added: “It sounds like an excuse for damaging changes.”

Pensions Buzz is held weekly to anonymously collect opinions from Professional Pensions readers on top news and trends. Respondents include actuaries, trustees, investment managers, lawyers, pension plan administrators and consultants. To participate, email our research team here.

[ad_2]