Township officials face allegations against them by city councilors | Local / Regional

[ad_1]

TOWNSHIP BOROUGH Public officials confronted City Councilor Chris Schrader and his past allegations against them at the Canton Borough Council meeting on July 12.

At the previous board meeting, Schrader said code enforcement officer John Raub should not have spoken at an earlier police meeting because he is employed in another section of the rounding.

Schrader thought Raub’s behavior in the meeting was unprofessional when Raub allegedly called him a jerk.

At Monday’s meeting, Raub confronted Schrader about his previous remarks regarding that police meeting.

He complains that I was in a police committee meeting as a private citizen and as a non-resident I didn’t have to speak, Raub said. However, matters of public interest when it comes to elected officials is everyone’s business.

Raub touched on the subject of issuing tickets for the WIP property, which has been a source of contention as it has not been looked after in previous years, resulting in scrub and unruly waste.

Issuing tickets for the property would create more conflict and a lengthy legal process that would ultimately cost taxpayers money, according to Raub.

Raub described ticketing as a tool in a very large toolbox and that their issuance is not always the right solution.

Just because I have a hammer doesn’t mean everything is a nail, he says.

At the last board meeting, Schrader accused administrator / treasurer Amy Seeley of getting board members to change their motions on previous decisions and that she allegedly scheduled meetings when he couldn’t be. there because of his working hours.

He also accused Seeley of alleged retaliation during a primary election event on May 18 when an election official accused him of yelling obscenities at voters.

It was later discovered that it was a different individual who had committed the obscenities, which prompted Schrader to claim that Seeley had orchestrated the accusation.

Seeley denied all charges at the June meeting.

At Monday’s meeting, Raub questioned Police Chief Doug Seeley about Schrader accusing Seeley of ordering the destruction of evidence without proper documentation or procedures, which Seeley previously denied and said he had followed all the appropriate protocols and supervised the destruction as managed by two boroughs. employees.

City Councilor David Groover alleged that while he was an employee of the Canton Borough Street Department, Seeley had him destroy evidence including drugs and drug paraphernalia by smashing them with machines and throwing them in a dumpster garbage.

Groover claimed that this was done in a very inappropriate manner and that he should not have dealt with it without a court order.

Seeley said the district attorney’s office told him that once an accused is convicted and serves their sentence, they have the right to dispose of the elements of a case.

He said he had recently met a Bradford County detective who told him what he had done was legal.

According to Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations of the Food and Drug Administration, on-site destruction procedures for controlled substances must be handled or observed by two employees of the registrant until the substance is rendered unrecoverable.

Chris, if you’re so sure Doug committed a crime, how come you haven’t been to the state police yet? Raub asked.

Before the start of the executive session, Schrader said he had a lot to say.

Board chairman Michael Shultz asked if his comments would require a motion at the end and when Schrader said likely no, the board voted to go into executive session.

Your items are not on the agenda, Shultz said.

There seems to be this misconception that any of you are my boss and can tell me when, where, or how to talk, Schrader said.

After the executive session, Schrader read David Groovers’ letter of resignation from the borough council.

In the letter, Groover thanked the upstanding and upstanding people who have provided support over the past few years and that he once had a positive view of the board.

Groover wrote that he felt the alleged lies and manipulation I encountered over the past year changed his opinion.

Some of the actions of recent times have been shameful and shameful. As a result, I no longer wish to be associated with this institution, he wrote.

The board accepted his resignation.

I only wish he had run for the last few months and maybe resigned on his own, Shultz said.

Schrader asked Schultz if he was not allowed to use his free speech.

Schultz responded that everyone else on the board brought their concerns forward to get them on the agenda.

You can do the same to give us the ability to read your articles and research them, Schultz said.

[ad_2]