[ad_1]
Over the past few weeks, Congress, particularly the House Financial Services Committee, has held a number of hearings on crypto and its role in the world. Even an audience meant to focus on oversight of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission saw questions about crypto and climate issues instead. Tomorrow, be sure to see another hearing, held with the House Agriculture Committee, specifically discussing crypto regulation.
You are reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter that examines the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to register for future editions.
Regulatory clarity, as defined by the crypto industry, can come in two ways: either a federal regulator provides formal guidance and rules that address either concern, or Congress pass a law defining these concerns. Regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued proposed rules (causing backlash from the industry in some cases), but hopes were generally focused on the possibility that Congress will take action. Were going to see another hearing start this week that hopes to tackle the crypto market.
Congress continues to wrestle with the idea of crypto regulation. What new guidelines would look like in practice is still up in the air, but lawmakers are taking another twist on the question on Wednesday.
We don’t know for sure if any real legislation will move forward this year. The industry expectation was that a stablecoin bill would have the best chance of success in terms of legislation. Those expectations were pretty well dashed during a stablecoin hearing earlier this month when Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, said the bill reflected reflection last October and that, in his view, the committee should start from scratch.
Granted, it never looked like the Senate Banking Committee was publicly about to get involved in the bill, but the fact that the House has a bipartisan product suggested there was a chance. It’s dead now.
Despite this, lawmakers seem optimistic about the chances of a bill being signed into law within the next year.
At Consensus 2023 the other week, I asked Congressman Patrick McHenry (RN.C.), chairman of the Financial Services Committee, if he thought there was a way for the legislation to become a law this year.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), the other lawmaker on stage with me, sounded equally optimistic.
From the House’s perspective, the next step toward legislation is still Wednesday’s hearing, which begins at 9:30 a.m. ET and features former Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman and current Harvard researcher Timothy Massad, Republic Crypto Chief Andrew Durgee, Dorr Partner Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Matthew Kulkin, Kraken General Counsel Marco Santori, and Web3 Foundation General Counsel Daniel Schoenberger.
In his written testimony, Massad said one of the issues was the lack of a federal cash market regulator for cryptocurrencies other than securities, and the debate over how to classify even if a crypto given is a security or not.
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler says most tokens are securities and the problem is failure to meet existing legal requirements. Industry participants are complaining about the lack of clarity in the rules to address this issue and have called on regulators to create a new set of rules specifically for crypto, he said. Meanwhile, trading and lending platforms claim they only deal in tokens that aren’t securities, thereby avoiding direct federal oversight. As a result, investor protection on crypto trading and lending platforms is woefully inadequate.
Massad proposed that Congress pass legislation creating certain principles and standards that every exchange should adhere to, whether the listed token is a security or a commodity.
This, he argued, would negate the need to broaden the definition of securities laws or create a new system of categories for digital assets while encompassing the entire crypto market.
The hearing also includes a joint motion for a resolution stating that Congress should provide additional guidance to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission on how to bring existing regulatory protections to the securities industry. cryptography.
If you have any ideas or questions about what I should be discussing next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, please feel free to email me at [email protected] or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.
You can also join the group chat on Telegram.
|
Sources 2/ https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/05/09/previewing-congresss-joint-crypto-regulation-hearing/?outputType=amp The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
[ad_2]