Supreme Court Orders Begin to Reinstate Trumps Grim Migrant Migration Policy Although He Did Not Actually Win the Election

[ad_1]

During the 24-hour news cycle, it can be hard to remember things that happened last week, let alone a single month ago. So just as a reminder for those in need of one, in November 2020, there was a big presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and the man wearing aviators won. With us until now? A few months later, Trump left the White House for Mar-a-Lago and Biden moved in, and Biden has since become president, while Trump was a private citizen who crashed memorial services. . In other words, on January 20, 2021, Trump ceased to have any power, while Biden, who, again, is our current president, has it all (subject to three branches of government, etc.). Who needs to be reminded of all this, you may be asking yourself? Doesn’t everyone know the fact that Joe Biden is president now and Trump is just someone who can be incarcerated? The answer to that is no, everyone is not. And it’s not just the last person in the office who is having trouble accepting that fact; it was the U.S. Supreme Court, which just issued an injunction ordering Biden to reinstate one of Trump’s most sensational policies.

Specifically, conservatives in court on Tuesday rejected the Biden administrations ’request to pause re-enforcement of the Trumps Remain policy in Mexico, which was ordered by a lower court despite its detrimental impact on U.S. relations with Mexico, not to mention the horrific impact on people trying to legally get to the U.S., who could be victims of rape and abduction and possible murder.

For NBC News:

The Department of Justice asked the court late last week to delay the re -shipment of the policy, known as Remain to Mexico, arguing in the brief report that the policy had slept for more than a year and that suddenly returning it was will contribute to the United States ’relationship with key partners in the region. , severely disrupting its operations on the southern border, and threatening to create a diplomatic and humanitarian crisis.

The policy is intended to encourage asylum seekers, but critics argue that it denies people the legal right to seek protection in the U.S. and forces them to wait in Mexico’s dangerous border cities. It requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico until their U.S. court dates, and it has previously left thousands of Central American migrants waiting in tent cities in places like Matamoros, Mexico. , where they were often subjected to theft, abduction, and assault.

As the former asylum official told This American Life in 2019, Youre … literally bringing people back so they were raped and killed. That’s what it is

As NBC News notes, Biden suspended the policy on his first day in office, and the Department of Homeland Security announced in June that it was permanently ending. But in reality, it essentially hasn’t worked since March 2020, because it wasn’t necessarily after a public health order that allowed the Trump administration to abandon everyone crossing the southwest border. The Biden administration argued in brief statements that the president had clear authority to determine immigration policy and that Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas had discretion in deciding whether to return asylum seekers to Mexico. But the Supreme Court clearly thought differently!

Attorneys general in Missouri and Texassued the Biden administration to reinstate the policy, saying the high number of asylum seekers is burdening states without DHS incarcerating them. Texas and Missouri also argued that the Biden administration did not go through proper administrative procedures at the end of the policy. The Biden administration appealed to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay on the order, but the court denied the stay on Tuesday night because the applicants failed to show the likelihood that they would succeed in getting their claim to have the policy removed.

Law and public policy experts reacted to the bizarre determination with anger. Georgetown professor Don Moynihan tweeted: Good and cool legal system we have, where the Supreme Court gives GOP Presidents wide latitude to dream up new ways of restricting immigration to way that violates international law but said Dem Presidents have no power to repeal those policies. Attorney and Vox reporter Ian Millhiser called it one of the most radical decisions of my life. Slate court and law columnist Mark Joseph Stern wrote: Absolute insanity. The majority conservative SCOTUS has repeatedly removed lower court orders to allow Trump to implement his immigration agenda. Now it allows a single district court judge to dictate foreign policy for the Biden administration. This is beyond rage …. This is one of the most lawless things SCOTUS has done.

The case will now be heard by an appeals court and could go back to the Supreme Court, which is perhaps little consolation to asylum seekers, given that the MO courts apparently let Trump rule in absentia.

Lots of Great Stories From Vanity Fair

How the US Left Behind Women in AfghanistanBillionaire Leon Black Flew a Russian Model to Meet Jeffrey Epstein Amid Donald Trumps Florida’s Fury and FantasyHow Rudy Giuliani Went From 9 / 11s Decided Mayor to 2021s Haunted Ghoul The DeSantiss Fox News on Exploring Florida? Congress Will Soon Get Trump’s Possible Evidence of Multiple Suspected CrimesHow the Ground Zero Mosque Meltdown Set the Table for Trump From the Archive: In the Valley of Death Not a subscriber? Join Vanity Fair to receive full access to VF.com and the complete online archive today.

[ad_2]