The Mazars, Trumps Accounting Firs, Stuck in an Uneasy Position

[ad_1]

The former Donald Trumps accounting firm is in a tough spot.

Mazars USA LLP faces supporting its longtime client while also working with authorities who now charge the Trump Organization with tax fraud.

The firm may decide to end its long-standing relationship with the Trump Organization. But walking away from a client won’t end the company’s professional obligations nor will it stop questions of past work for Trump’s global real estate business.

Mazars could be stuck with Trump for better or worse. In the short term, a criminal case in New York and an ongoing congressional investigation could tarnish the reputation of companies. Partners may leave, clients may move to another CPA firm, revenues may decline.

But there is also an opportunity to boost the reputation and position of the companies among the 30 largest companies in the country through the stand of its client and its work.

Firms will have clients with difficulties of one kind or another. And testing whether this accounting firm can be a trusted business partner for a firm is how they handle this situation, said Jon Baumunk, accounting ethics advisor at San Diego State University.

Role of the Professional

Mazars declined to comment on the impact that criminal cases against the Trump Organization have had on the company, or on its current business relationship with the real estate developer.

Due to our industrial professional obligations Mazars may not discuss any current or past client, the status of our relationships, or the nature of our services in a public forum without the client’s consent or if required by law. We remain committed to fulfilling all of our professional and legal obligations, the firm said in a statement.

Mazars followed up with a New York grand jury subpoena, which charged more than eight years worth of records related to former President Donald Trump’s former personal and tax return to state prosecutors. The relevant records remain controversial as part of a congressional inquiry into Trumps finances.

Court orders represent one of several exceptions to accounting ethics rules that generally require companies to guard confidential client information.

But those ethical policies do not prevent the firm from terminating a client relationship option that a firm should consider if a client posed a threat to its reputation, said Joe Schroeder, associate professor of accounting at Indiana University.

And right now the Mazars brand is being hurt because of its association with Trump, he said.

The only thing you sell is your reputation, he said of CPA firms. And the minute your reputation is discussed, it will be hard for you to do business.

When to Walk, or Stay

The risks to the reputation of companies can spread. Clients may not want to be associated with a firm or controversial client and may find a new CPA firm to protect their own brand. Others may leave to reduce the chance that investigators will begin to scrutinize their own tax reporting, he said.

Risks can also cascade to company partners, who may also decide they don’t want to be associated with the company and build a store elsewhere, he said.

Both can result in lower profits for the company.

The firm now has 11 offices across the U.S. and nearly 100 partners, and reported $ 218 million in revenue last year. Mazars USA, which is part of the Belgium -based global network, has lost to top U.S. companies in recent years, lost partners and slipped from No. 24 posts to No. 26 despite revenue gains, according to Accounting Todays ’annual ranking of the Top 100 companies.

The Mazars, through a series of mergers that began decades ago, typically inherited Donald Trumps business from his father Fred, according to a Pro Publica story.

Clients facing investigations or litigation need the help of professionals such as accountants and attorneys mostly, said Michael Dell, an accountant liability attorney with Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP.

People have a right to counsel, Dell said. The simple fact that a client is controversial or facing investigations does not mean you need or have a professional responsibility to drop them.

Accountants ’duty to protect a former client’s confidential records doesn’t end when bills stop coming in, and the work the firm completes is their job, Dell said.

Those obligations are spelled out in the professions code of conduct, a playbook of ethics often baked into state laws and regulations governing public accounting. Violations can cost a CPA their license.

Criminal Charges are rare

Whether Mazars will face criminal charges is unlikely, said Cliff Capdevielle, managing attorney at Moskowitz LLP. The risk of a lawsuit against a criminal against a tax preparer is very small unless they have two sets of books and reported something that is not true. And that hardly happens, he said.

The duty of tax preparers is limited to receiving numbers from the client and depositing them on the tax return. Ultimately the client is responsible for the accuracy of that information. But giving tax planning advice can open a company to fines or penalties, said Allison Koester, a corporate taxation researcher at Georgetown University.

The Trump Organization and the former CFO are facing tax fraud charges for what prosecutors describe as a more than 15-year tax scheme designed to report income and taxable benefits paid to certain employees, which effectively lowers the tax charge for both employees and the company.

It is not uncommon during a tax investigation for authorities to take testimony from accountants who did that work. But those investigations don’t always result in charges or allegations of misconduct by outside professionals, Dell said.

It’s also not uncommon for a taxpayer to argue that they just followed the advice of their hired CPA firm, and for the firm to say it relied on information provided by the client. There will be a pointing finger, said Jack Barcal, associate professor of taxation at the USC Marshall School of Business.

Such a defense strategy may not succeed if the outside consultant or accountant does not have all the information they need to properly advise the client that prosecutors want to know before pursuing charges, said David Sharfstein, a former prosecutor. that prosecutor is now a partner of Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Criminal charges against the largest accounting firm in the United States are rare, though the Big Four accounting firms have each faced brushes in federal investigation for their tax planning work in the past. years.

KPMG LLP avoided prosecution for a massive tax protection scheme after agreeing a $ 456 million settlement with the Justice Department in 2005. But it is the specter of Arthur Andersens ’downfall that still haunts the industry. of accounting after two decades.

That firm struggled under the weight of a string of good repairs associated with its audit work but a criminal conviction, though later overturned, related to its audit client Enron Corp. . The case stands as a solid example of how beneficial clients can circumvent the judgment, and ethics, of accountants.

Firms with a small portfolio may feel more pressure to accept a large client demand. Is the money worth the potential damage to their reputation and exposure to litigation, Schroeder said.

[ad_2]