Intel reports have repeatedly failed to forecast unrest in the Capitol

[ad_1]

WASHINGTON-Intelligence reports compiled by U.S. Capitol Police in the days before last year’s insurgency thought only an unlikely or distant danger of violence, though other assessments warn that crowds of potentially thousands of pro-Trump demonstrators could converge in Washington and create a dangerous situation.

The documents, obtained by The Associated Press, highlight the unequal and chaotic intelligence that spread among Capitol Police officers before the riots on Jan. 6, when thousands of Donald Trump loyalists flocked to the Capitol complex and violently clashed with law enforcement officials in their efforts to disrupt the certification of the results of the 2020 presidential election. The intelligence reports specifically show how the police agency, until the very day of the riot, greatly underestimated the possibility of chaotic violence and disruption.

The conflicting intelligence produced by law enforcement leading to the unrest led to a congressional investigation into the preparation and response on Jan. 6, in which officials struggled to explain how they failed to hope and plan for deadly riot in the Capitol that day. . The shortcomings led to a revolt in the top ranks of the department, including the dismissal of the chief, although the assistant chief in charge of protection and intelligence operations at the time remained in his position.

There was, according to a strictly critical Senate report released in June, “a lack of consensus about the gravity of the threat posed on January 6, 2021.”

“Months following the attack on the U.S. Capitol, there is still no consensus among USCP officials about reviewing the threat of intelligence reports prior to Jan. 6, 2021,” the report said.

The documents, known as a “daily intelligence report” and marked “For Official Use Only,” were described last year in congressional testimony and in the Senate report. The AP on Friday night got the full version of the documents for Jan. 4, 5 and 6 of last year. The New York Times featured the Jan. 4 report in a story last year on intelligence deficiencies.

On each of the three days, documents show, Capitol Police ranked as “highly improbable” the possibility of acts of civil disobedience and arrests arising from the “Stop the Steal” protests planned for the Capitol . Documents ranked that event and gatherings planned for Jan. 6. by about 20 other organizers on the scale “long-distance” to “almost certain” in terms of the possibility of large delays. All were rated as either “remote,” “highly improbable” or “improbable,” the documents show.

“No further information was found on the exact actions planned by this group,” said a Jan. 6 report about the “Stop the Steal” rally.

The Million MAGA March planned by Trump supporters was rated in the document as “impossible,” which officials say is “possible” that organizers could show up at the Capitol complex, and that there has even been talk about to the counter-demonstrators, there is “no clear plan by those groups so far.”

Another event by a group known as the Prime Time Patriots was similarly described as having a “highly improbable” chance for disruption, with the report reiterating that “no further information was found on the exact actions planned. of this group. “

Those optimistic forecasts are hard to compare with the separate intelligence assessments compiled by Capitol Police in late December and early January. Those documents, also obtained by the AP, warn that crowds could number in the thousands and include members of extremist groups such as the Proud Boys.

A memo on January 3, 2021, for example, warned of a “significantly dangerous situation for law enforcement and the general public” due to the potential presence of “white supremacists, militia members and others who are actively promoting of violence. “

“Unlike previous post-election protests, the targets of pro-Trump supporters are not necessarily the counter-protesters as before, but instead, Congress itself is the target of the 6th,” he said. report.

Adding to the intelligence mix is ​​a bulletin on Jan. 5 prepared by the FBI’s Norfolk field office warning of the potential for “war” at the Capitol. Capitol Police officials said they did not know of that document at the time. FBI Director Chris Wray said the report was disseminated by the FBI’s joint terrorism task force, which was discussed at a command post in Washington and posted on an internet portal available to other law enforcement agencies.

Capitol Police officials have repeatedly insisted that they have no definite or credible intelligence that any demonstration at the Capitol would result in a massive attack on the building. Despite investigating intelligence deficiencies, Yogananda Pittman, the assistant chief in charge of intelligence at the time of the riot, remained in that position.

The current police chief, J. Thomas Manger, defended Pittman in an interview with the AP in September, pointing to his decision when he was acting chief to implement the recommendations made by the inspector general and expand capabilities in internal intelligence of the department so that officers do not. have to rely heavily on intelligence gathered by other law enforcement agencies.

[ad_2]