[ad_1]
Former President Donald Trump on Thursday took to social media about his latest indictment, targeting special counsel Jack Smith and repeating his widely disputed claim that the “Clinton socks” case and the Presidential Records Act prove that he was innocent in the investigation of his handling. of national security materials after leaving office.
Trump had previously complained about the Justice Department’s investigation when he appeared in Miami federal district court where he appeared Tuesday and pleaded not guilty to all 37 counts outlined in the indictment, which include willful retention of national information. defense, conspiracy to obstruct justice and wrongdoing. statements.
The Republican frontrunner continued to express his anger at the allegations on Truth Social Thursday night, falsely claiming he was “absolutely exonerated” and demanding the return of his boxes.
“SO NOW THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, PLUS THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, TOTALLY EXONERATE ME FROM THE CONTINUING WITCH HUNT BROUGHT BY CORRUPT JOE BIDEN, DOJ, DERANGED JACK SMITH, AND THEIR RADICAL TLEFT. THEY WILL REMOVE ALL CHARGES AGAINST ME, APOLOGIZE, AND RETURN EVERYTHING ILLEGALLY TAKEN (FOURTH AMENDMENT) FROM MY HOUSE? THIS WAS NOTHING BUT ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!”THIS WAS NOTHING BUT ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!! ” , repeating remarks he made at his rally Tuesday in Bedminster, New Jersey.
Trump’s references to the Presidential Records Act and the “Clinton socks” case don’t quite give the full context of either. Legal experts told Salon that Trump’s case is very different from that of former President Bill Clinton, who reportedly claimed to have kept recordings from oral history interviews with a historian who -authored a book about his presidency in a sock drawer.
Under the PRA, which defines the scope of presidential records and states they belong to the government, Clinton’s interviews qualify as diaries and are not, in fact, presidential notes, the former US attorney explained. that is Barb McQuade.
Experts also clarified that Trump was not charged with violating the PRA, but the Espionage Act, which instead refers to national defense records from agencies like the CIA that the indictment says he illegally retained.
“PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AT A LEVEL RARELY SEEN IN OUR COUNTRY BEFORE!” Trump continued on Truth Social.
“AFTER GOING THROUGH A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FOR TWO YEARS BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, IT IS JUST ANNOUNCED THAT THE CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED, AND NO CHARGES WILL BE FILED. NOTHING IS WRONG, BUT WHERE AND WHEN WILL I GET MY REPUTATION BACK?” he said, referring to the investigation in suburban New York into whether he or his company deceived authorities to reduce their property taxes.
“WHEN ARE THE OTHER FAKE CASES AGAINST ME DOWN? ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!” he concluded.
Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.
National security law experts warn that Trump’s Truth Social rants aren’t doing him any favors.
“He still wants the documents back. Keep admitting to intent, Donnie,” national security attorney Bradley Moss responded to Trump’s first post.
“Trump’s legal and political strategies continue to conflict. Legally, every time he ‘speaks’ he brings himself one step closer to conviction,” national security attorney Mark Zaidadded. “Politically, it’s to his advantage to be grandiose and aggressive. Raises funds, creates support and polarizes. Which will prevail in the end?”
Read more
about Trump’s indictment
|
Sources 2/ https://www.salon.com/2023/06/16/claims-hes-exonerated-and-demands-his-boxes-back-experts-say-hes-confessing-to-intent/ The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
[ad_2]