‘Can’t blame the skipper’: Former IND and New Zealand cricketers react to Ajaz Patel not considering LBW’s appeal against Shubman Gill | Locust

[ad_1]

India opener Shubman Gill was pounding on six when a delivery from the New Zealand left arm spinner hit the batter on his pads. Gill had chopped off the wicket but tried to defend the ball. As the ball hit the pads, Patel and the rest of the New Zealand squad went on low appeal as the referee nodded. No DRS was taken.

However, when the replay appeared on the big screen, it showed that the ball would have continued to hit the middle stump, much to the surprise and dismay of left arm spinner Patel. New Zealand had already lost a review early in the game when an LBW appeal against Southee was called off. As the referee’s finger went up, Gill immediately reviewed and the replay showed a huge inside edge before the ball hit his pads.

Read also | India vs New Zealand live score, 1st test, day 1: Rahane and Iyer to rebuild the Indian heats

It was a pivotal moment in the game for New Zealand as Gill went on to score a fourth test in half a century. Former New Zealand fast Simon Doull believes that with two remaining notices New Zealand could have revisited the call as there was no chance of the ball going over the stumps.

“They still had two DRSs left. You would think there was an opportunity there. The problem was how far he was on the pitch. They would all have thought he was too far. never went too far. That’s the only thing you’re sure about this area. You have to hit it very close to the ball to get over the stumps. They depend heavily on Tom Blundell who is new to this squad. test-match. Maybe they weren’t sure. You can’t really blame the skipper for that, “Doull said on Star Sports during the lunch break.

Read also | Australian great Ricky Ponting reacts as Shreyas Iyer becomes India’s 303rd tryout cricketer: “I saw the work you did”

India were shaken twice after lunch with Kyle Jamieson throwing Gill and Southee knocking out Cheteshwar Pujara, caught by the wicket keeper, restricting India from 82/1 to 106/3. The rest of the game could have been in New Zealand’s favor, as former Indian all-rounder Irfan Pathan rightly pointed out.

“They (New Zealand) should have gone. Ajaz is not a guy who plays with a very high arm. Refereeing has changed. With technology and the ways in which it has changed, you should go. The referees are ready to give those rulings. You have to go, and they should have gone. They would have had two wickets and would have been much happier, “said Pathan.

[ad_2]