Here’s the bizarre way Republicans try to blame Stacey Abrams for Trump’s ‘big lie’

[ad_1]

As Stacey Abrams launches the campaign trail for a second Georgia gubernatorial run, Republicans scramble to keep her current run entirely devoted to her previous one in 2018. According to Politico, Republicans are focusing on the final speech Abrams after the 2018 gubernatorial election.

At the time, Abrams made it clear that his speech was not a concession. Now Republicans are likening his stance to former President Donald Trump’s refusal to give in after losing the 2020 presidential election to President Joe Biden. The point of their argument: “On respecting the will of the voters, the Democrats are hypocrites.

A Republican strategist in Georgia recently weighed in on this argument. “Democrats are attacking Trump and Republicans for believing these plots, believing what they call the ‘big lie.’ But the original Big Lie promoter was Stacey Abrams,” Brian Robinson said. “She was ahead of the game. her time because she’s on so many things. “

However, at the time, Abrams offered a different perspective on the definition of the franchise. When she gave her last speech 10 days after the election, she laid out her case and explained why she would not give in. “Concession means recognizing that an action is right, true or appropriate. As a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede,” Abrams told his supporters in 2018. “But my assessment is that the law is the law. does not currently allow any other viable remedy. “

Want a daily rundown of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Even now, Abrams is still true to his belief. In a recent appearance on CNN this month, Abrams said Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) “won by the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against Georgia voters. “.

“On November 16, 2018, I acknowledged at the top of my speech that Brian Kemp is the Governor of Georgia and even wished him luck at the end of the speech,” Abrams said. “And in the middle, I talked about the fact that we had a system that he managed, that he manipulated, hurt the Georgian voters and that the responsibility of the leaders was to challenge the systems that do not serve the people.”

After the election, Fair Fight Action – the Abrams group founded shortly after the 2018 gubernatorial election to fight voter suppression – filed a complaint that cited “Georgia’s exact match law among other things, saying that it was disproportionately targeting minority voters for the first time. Further, he alleges that election officials were not properly trained to cancel postal ballots, preventing access to the ballot for dozens of voters who chose to vote in person. “

Seth Bringman, one of Abrams spokespersons, also reiterated his position.

“After election day in 2018, Abrams’ campaign went to federal court, several judges accepted our demands and more Georgian votes were counted,” Bringman said. “She acknowledged the election result but refused to accept that it was fair to the voters – and she worked to change Georgia’s voting system for the upcoming election.”

Read more stories like this:

[ad_2]