A global recession is near certain and the Fed is to blame, says UN

[ad_1]

Hi, Peter Vanham here, writing on a plane from Geneva to New York, filling for Alan.

Were already in a global slowdown, and if no immediate policy actions are taken to curb speculative behavior and markup prices in energy, food, and other concentrated global industries, well be in a full-fledged recession by the end of the year, induced in part by excessive rate rises.

Dont take my word for it: this is the analysis of Rebeca Grynspan, the secretary-general of the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), a UN agency that tracks global growth and trade in developing countries, whom I sat down with in Geneva. At times, he felt like a Jaccuse of American capitalism, though Grynspan oft repeated his agency is pro-capitalist, promoting trade.

First the news: according to the latest UNCTAD Trade and Development report, global growth is expected to slow down to 2.5% this year, and 2.3% by 2023. That means a global recession is almost a fact, as 2.5% is the threshold for that. (A top rate of 2.5% globally means many regions are in a recession, while other regions experience de facto negative growth when adjusted for population.)

Whos to blame and how can worse be warned? The Fed with its sole focus on domestic price inflation certainly does not make a good impression, according to Grynspan. By rapidly and incessantly raising interest rates, it and other central banks engage in an imprudent gamble, as they are a harsh and blunt tool, and there is no way you can control inflation without getting into a recession.

One consequence: some 90 developing countries saw their currency weaken against the dollar this year, making it harder for them to buy any goods priced in dollar, or pay back dollar-denominated debt, and leading almost all into an economic downturn.

What makes matters worse, Grynspan says, is that aggregate demand isnt the main cause for price rises: It is markups and speculation. You have to look at the supply side.

To back up her analysis, Grynspan and her colleague Anastasia Nesvetailova, UNCTADs macro-economist, share two observations. First, in the US, they see corporate profits now driving 50% of price growth, compared to 10% previously. It suggests increased market concentration and pricing power.

Second, they say, speculators are causing further turmoil in commodity and energy markets. In places like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, future markets are usually controlled by price hedgers, in a ratio of 70/30 to speculators. Now, according to UNCTAD, that ratio has reversed.

What to do about it? We need a policy mix, according to Grynspan. At CME and other future exchanges, rules to rein in speculators, as was the case in the Obama era. Among Fortune Global 500 companies, a commitment to fair pricing, or else an agreement among governments to regulate and tax.

And if that doesn’t happen? Well continue to live in a world of cascading crises, Grynspan warns. We dont get out of one, and we get into another. It cannot be that we think this is in the interest of the Fortune 500, or the most important economy in the world.

More news below.

Peter [email protected]@fortune.com

TOP NEWS

Musk and Twitter

When will this saga finally be over? According to the Journal, Twitter and Elon Musks representatives still cant agree on the terms of his $44 billion takeover, specifically whether the deals closure requires Musks raising of debt financing, and what it will take to end litigation between the two sides. wall street journal

Oil Row

The US has, as predicted, reacted angrily to the OPEC+ cartels decision to cut oil production by 2 million barrels a day. The White House called the decision, which could boost oil prices shortly before the midterms, shortsighted and aligning with Russia. The Saudis, whom the Biden administration had been trying to court, claim there is no belligerence involved, and the move was intended to encourage investment. FinancialTimes

wind worries

Despite the push for a transition to renewable energy sources, onshore wind turbines are not a profitable business right now. Yesterday that fact led General Electric to lay off hundreds of workers at its onshore wind unit, while Spanish-listed rival Siemens Gamesa reportedly tossed out CEO Lars Bondo Krogsgaard due to losses. Reuters

AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

Top economist Steve Hanke says the incompetent Fed is on a fast track to cause a terrible recession, by Shawn Tully

Fast-fashion giant Zara faces a huge challenge in the climate crisis. Can its heiress-turned-leader make the brand fast, cheap, and green?, by Vivienne Walt

It will take more than talk to improve the future of work, by Deborah Lovich and Sebastian Ullrich

Ex-Disney CEO Bob Iger explains why he backed Canva, the $26 billion design startup and how it fits into his investment strategy, by Emma Hinchliffe

McDonalds workers are begging customers to stop ordering adult Happy Meals, a nostalgic marketing ploy: New adult Happy Meals are killing me, by Nicholas Gordon

This edition of CEO Daily was edited by David Meyer.

This is the web version of CEO Daily, a newsletter of must-read insights from FortuneCEO Alan Murray. Sign up to get it delivered free to yourinbox.

[ad_2]